Sur 0–100 km/h, 128ti F40 gagne (6,22 s vs 7,29 s).
Performance comparison
Simulated drag race 0 → 1,000 m in real time. Synchronised speed counters and stopwatch. Physics calibration on 7 manufacturer measurements.
Simulation
Calibration
Physics model calibrated on manufacturer splits. The limited top speed is not the real aerodynamic top speed of the vehicles.
| 128ti F40 | 220d F22 | |
|---|---|---|
| 0–100 km/h | 6,22 s−1,07 s | 7,29 s |
| 400 m standing start | 14,31 s−1,10 s | 15,41 s |
| 1,000 m standing start | 25,38 s−2,27 s | 27,65 s |
| Top speed (electronically limited) | 250 km/h+20 km/h | 230 km/h |
| Power-to-weight ratio | 5,45 kg/hpbetter ratio | 7,53 kg/hp |
Standing-start drag race, calibrated on manufacturer splits. The gap shows at each stage.
Simulated performance at each stage. Winner in green.
| Palier | 128ti F40 | 220d F22 |
|---|---|---|
| 0–30 km/h | 1,88 s | 2,11 s |
| 0–50 km/h | 3,14 s | 3,35 s |
| 0–80 km/h | 4,86 s | 5,41 s |
| 0–100 km/h | 6,22 s | 7,29 s |
| 0–120 km/h | 7,95 s | 9,70 s |
| 0–160 km/h | 12,77 s | 16,80 s |
| 0–200 km/h | 20,72 s | 30,35 s |
| 400 m standing start | 14,31 s | 15,41 s |
| 1,000 m standing start | 25,38 s | 27,65 s |
| Top speed limited | 250 km/h | 230 km/h |
Manufacturer technical specifications. The power-to-weight ratio is the key physical factor in a drag race.
| Characteristic | Value | Detail |
|---|---|---|
| Power | 265 hp | 4 cyl |
| Torque | 400 Nm | |
| Weight | 1 445 kg | manufacturer kerb weight |
| Drivetrain | Traction | |
| Gearbox | Eight-speed Steptronic Sport transmission |
| Characteristic | Value | Detail |
|---|---|---|
| Power | 190 hp | 4 cyl |
| Torque | 400 Nm | |
| Weight | 1 430 kg | manufacturer kerb weight |
| Drivetrain | 220d | |
| Gearbox | 6-speed manual (8-speed Steptronic) |
Off the line, the Bmw 128ti hits 100 km/h in 6.22 s versus 7.29 s for the Bmw 220d. At this point, the Bmw 128ti leads by 1.07 s and sits roughly 8 m ahead.
At 200 metres, the Bmw 128ti is doing 136 km/h against 124 km/h for the Bmw 220d. The gap is 0.63 s. The challenger starts to claw back ground.
At 400 metres standing start, the Bmw 128ti crosses the line in 14.31 s versus 15.41 s. The 1.10 s gap represents roughly 46 m of track — a gap visible to the naked eye.
Past 400 metres, the Bmw 128ti continues to build its lead. At 600 metres, it runs at 190 km/h versus 172 km/h. At 1,000 metres, the Bmw 128ti finishes in 25.37 s versus 27.65 s, with a 2.27 s lead.
Both rivals are electronically governed, but not at the same level: the Bmw 128ti is capped at 250 (i.e. 155 mph — industry threshold) km/h, the Bmw 220d at 230 km/h. This isn’t a physical engine limit — it’s a manufacturer choice, usually for tyre safety or homologation reasons. Neither car reaches its true aerodynamic top speed.
With two combustion powertrains, the difference comes down to power-to-weight ratio (5.45 kg/hp vs 7.53 kg/hp) and transmission (Automatic vs Automatic).
In European road use (130 km/h max), both vehicles reach the legal speed limit in under 11.16 seconds. The 1.07 s difference in 0 to 100 km/h is mostly felt in motorway merging and overtaking.
Swap one of the two models to explore an equivalent duel in the same segment.
Sur 0–100 km/h, 128ti F40 gagne (6,22 s vs 7,29 s).
128ti F40 passe de 0 à 100 km/h en 6,22 secondes (simulation calibrée).
128ti F40 : 265 hp, ratio 5,45 kg/hp. 220d F22 : 190 hp, ratio 7,53 kg/hp.
128ti F40 : 250 km/h. 220d F22 : 230 km/h.