Performance duelHome › Duel

Renault Kadjar 1.3 TCe 160 EDC vs Bmw 318d F30 : which one is faster?

0-100 km/h, 400 m, 1000 m, top speed — physics simulation calibrated on 7 measures.

Renault Kadjar 1.3 TCe 160 EDCVMax
0-100
76
0 – 100 km/h
9.81s
0.39 s
318d
9.42s
400 m standing start
17.37s
0.60 s
318d
16.77s
Top speed
213
5 km/h
Kadjar
208
Power160 ch
Power143 ch
Torque260 Nm
Torque320 Nm
Weight1 445 kg
Weight1 495 kg
DrivetrainFront-wheel drive (FWD)
DrivetrainRear-wheel drive (RWD)
GearboxAutomated manual ·…
GearboxAutomatic · Steptr…
VMax
Renault Kadjar 1.3 TCe 160 EDC
Renault
Kadjar 1.3 TCe 160 EDC
2019
9,81 s
213 km/h
Power160 ch
Torque260 Nm
Weight1 445 kg
DrivetrainFront-wheel drive (FWD)
Faster
BMW
318d F30
2012
9,42 s
208 km/h
Power143 ch
Torque320 Nm
Weight1 495 kg
DrivetrainRear-wheel drive (RWD)
Renault Kadjar 1.3 TCe 160 EDC
2019 · PETROL · 160 ch
Bmw 318d
2012 · HYBRID · 143 ch
0-30 km/h2,80 s
0-50 km/h4,69 s
0-80 km/h7,47 s
0-100 km/h9,81 s
0-120 km/h12,86 s
0-160 km/h22,47 s
0-200 km/h48,00 s
400 m DA17,37 s
1 000 m DA30,61 s
VMax213 km/h
0-30 km/h1,77 s
0-50 km/h3,16 s
0-80 km/h6,37 s
0-100 km/h9,42 s
0-120 km/h13,33 s
0-160 km/h25,98 s
0-200 km/h65,45 s
400 m DA16,77 s
1 000 m DA30,82 s
VMax208 km/h
DQM95%
Kadjar 1.3 TCe 160 EDC
--
318d
--

Simulation de performance

Race simulation at real speed

CONFIDENCE 95%
400 m result
16.77s
Bmw 318d
Gap
0.60s
Distance
400 m
Dist.
Kadjar 1.3
Gap
Bmw 318d
0 m
0.00 s
0 km/h
0 m
0.00 s
0 km/h
100 m
8.20 s
87 km/h
~24 m
5 long.
7.16 s
86 km/h
200 m
11.77 s
113 km/h
~28 m
6 long.
10.85 s
108 km/h
400 m
17.37 s
142 km/h
~23 m
5 long.
16.77 s
134 km/h
600 m
22.14 s
159 km/h
~13 m
3 long.
21.84 s
150 km/h
1,000 m
30.61 s
179 km/h
~10 m
2 long.
30.82 s
169 km/h

At 400 m, Bmw 318d leads by 0.60 s. At 1 000 m, Renault Kadjar 1.3 TCe 160 EDC takes the lead by 0.21 s.

Calibrated physics simulation: SCx via VMax, power curves, Crr via WLTP, drivetrain losses. Manufacturer 0-100 is the calibration target. Confidence 95 %.

400 m
RACE MODE

Upcoming offersExclusive

Receive personalized offers

Pour recevoir les meilleures offres près de chez vous



Kadjar 1.3 TCe 160 EDC vs Bmw 318d: chronicle of a drag race at 213 km/h

The launch: 0 to 100 km/h

Off the line, the Bmw 318d hits 100 km/h in 9.42 s versus 9.81 s for the Kadjar 1.3 TCe 160 EDC. At this point, the Bmw 318d leads by 0.39 s and sits roughly 28 m ahead.

From 100 km/h to 400 metres

At 200 metres, the Bmw 318d is doing 108 km/h against 113 km/h for the Kadjar 1.3 TCe 160 EDC. The gap is 0.92 s. The gap widens compared to the 0-100.

At 400 metres standing start, the Bmw 318d crosses the line in 16.77 s versus 17.37 s. The 0.60 s gap represents roughly 23 m of track — two to three car lengths.

Beyond 400 metres: top speed comes into play

Past 400 metres, the situation changes. The Bmw 318d maxes out at 208 km/h while the Kadjar 1.3 TCe 160 EDC keeps accelerating towards 213 km/h. At 600 metres, the gap has dropped to 0.30 s.

Around 826 metres, both vehicles are level. This is the inversion point: the Kadjar 1.3 TCe 160 EDC overcomes its launch deficit thanks to a 5 km/h higher top speed.

At 1,000 metres, the Kadjar 1.3 TCe 160 EDC finishes in 30.61 s versus 30.82 s. The 0.21 s delta shows an extremely tight race.

What the numbers don’t tell you

Electronically capped at 210 km/h, the Bmw 318d never reaches its natural aerodynamic ceiling in this duel. That’s not a physical limit of the motor — it’s a deliberate manufacturer decision, typically tied to standard-fit tyre ratings or model-range positioning.

With two combustion powertrains, the difference comes down to power-to-weight ratio (9.03 kg/hp vs 10.45 kg/hp) and transmission (Automatic vs Automatic).

In European road use (130 km/h max), both vehicles reach the legal speed limit in under 15.78 seconds. The 0.39 s difference in 0 to 100 km/h is mostly felt in motorway merging and overtaking.

Bmw 318d has a clear edge over the Renault Kadjar 1.3 TCe 160 EDC to 100 km/h. This difference is clearly noticeable in spirited driving and widens on standing starts.

Données de performance issues de simulations physiques calibrées (moteur Apex). Consommation basée sur les données WLTP constructeur. Les performances réelles peuvent varier selon les conditions d'utilisation.

Prix énergie indicatifs : essence 1,85€/L, diesel 1,75€/L, électricité 0,25€/kWh (tarif domestique). Calculs basés sur 20 000 km/an.

Caralogy est un service indépendant de comparaison. Les données affichées sont fournies à titre informatif et ne constituent pas une offre commerciale.