Sur 0–100 km/h, 530d G30 gagne (5,77 s vs 8,36 s).
Performance comparison
Simulated drag race 0 → 1,000 m in real time. Synchronised speed counters and stopwatch. Physics calibration on 7 manufacturer measurements.
Simulation
Calibration
Physics model calibrated on manufacturer splits. The limited top speed is not the real aerodynamic top speed of the vehicles.
| 530d G30 | DS9 E-Tense 250 | |
|---|---|---|
| 0–100 km/h | 5,77 s−2,59 s | 8,36 s |
| 400 m standing start | 14,08 s−2,14 s | 16,22 s |
| 1,000 m standing start | 25,72 s−2,85 s | 28,57 s |
| Top speed (electronically limited) | 250 km/h+15 km/h | 235 km/h |
| Power-to-weight ratio | 6,57 kg/hpbetter ratio | 7,51 kg/hp |
Standing-start drag race, calibrated on manufacturer splits. The gap shows at each stage.
Simulated performance at each stage. Winner in green.
| Palier | 530d G30 | DS9 E-Tense 250 |
|---|---|---|
| 0–30 km/h | 1,40 s | 2,40 s |
| 0–50 km/h | 2,27 s | 4,01 s |
| 0–80 km/h | 4,08 s | 6,47 s |
| 0–100 km/h | 5,77 s | 8,36 s |
| 0–120 km/h | 7,91 s | 10,88 s |
| 0–160 km/h | 13,93 s | 18,12 s |
| 0–200 km/h | 23,85 s | 31,70 s |
| 400 m standing start | 14,08 s | 16,22 s |
| 1,000 m standing start | 25,72 s | 28,57 s |
| Top speed limited | 250 km/h | 235 km/h |
Manufacturer technical specifications. The power-to-weight ratio is the key physical factor in a drag race.
| Characteristic | Value | Detail |
|---|---|---|
| Power | 265 hp | 6 cyl |
| Torque | 620 Nm | |
| Weight | 1 740 kg | manufacturer kerb weight |
| Drivetrain | Propulsion | |
| Gearbox | 8-speed Steptronic |
| Characteristic | Value | Detail |
|---|---|---|
| Power | 253 hp | Pending |
| Torque | 520 Nm | |
| Weight | 1 900 kg | manufacturer kerb weight |
| Drivetrain | DS9 E-Tense 250 | |
| Gearbox | 8-speed automatic |
Off the line, the Bmw 530d hits 100 km/h in 5.77 s versus 8.36 s for the DS9 E-Tense 250. Despite lacking instant torque, 265 hp of power compensates. At this point, the Bmw 530d leads by 2.59 s and sits roughly 34 m ahead.
At 200 metres, the Bmw 530d is doing 130 km/h against 121 km/h for the DS9 E-Tense 250. The gap is 1.83 s. The challenger starts to claw back ground.
At 400 metres standing start, the Bmw 530d crosses the line in 14.07 s versus 16.22 s. The 2.14 s gap represents roughly 87 m of track — a gap visible to the naked eye.
Past 400 metres, the Bmw 530d continues to build its lead. At 600 metres, it runs at 180 km/h versus 170 km/h. At 1,000 metres, the Bmw 530d finishes in 25.72 s versus 28.57 s, with a 2.85 s lead.
Electronically capped at 250 (i.e. 155 mph — industry threshold) km/h, the Bmw 530d never reaches its natural aerodynamic ceiling in this duel. That’s not a physical limit of the motor — it’s a deliberate manufacturer decision, typically tied to standard-fit tyre ratings or model-range positioning.
Instant electric torque gives an advantage off the line. The higher top speed of the combustion engine gives an advantage over longer distances. The distance at which one catches the other depends on the top speed differential.
In European road use (130 km/h max), both vehicles reach the legal speed limit in under 12.32 seconds. The 2.59 s difference in 0 to 100 km/h is mostly felt in motorway merging and overtaking.
Swap one of the two models to explore an equivalent duel in the same segment.
Sur 0–100 km/h, 530d G30 gagne (5,77 s vs 8,36 s).
530d G30 passe de 0 à 100 km/h en 5,77 secondes (simulation calibrée).
530d G30 : 265 hp, ratio 6,57 kg/hp. DS9 E-Tense 250 : 253 hp, ratio 7,51 kg/hp.
530d G30 : 250 km/h. DS9 E-Tense 250 : 235 km/h.