Sur 0–100 km/h, Model S Long Range gagne (3,21 s vs 3,33 s).
Performance comparison
Simulated drag race 0 → 1,000 m in real time. Synchronised speed counters and stopwatch. Physics calibration on 7 manufacturer measurements.
Simulation
Calibration
Physics model calibrated on manufacturer splits. The limited top speed is not the real aerodynamic top speed of the vehicles.
| RS e-tron GT | Model S Long Range | |
|---|---|---|
| 0–100 km/h | 3,33 s | 3,21 s+0,12 s |
| 400 m standing start | 11,32 s | 11,02 s+0,30 s |
| 1,000 m standing start | 20,60 s | 20,06 s+0,54 s |
| Top speed (electronically limited) | 250 km/h | 250 km/h |
| Power-to-weight ratio | 3,57 kg/hp | 3,09 kg/hpbetter ratio |
Standing-start drag race, calibrated on manufacturer splits. The gap shows at each stage.
Simulated performance at each stage. Winner in green.
| Palier | RS e-tron GT | Model S Long Range |
|---|---|---|
| 0–30 km/h | 0,95 s | 0,94 stight gap |
| 0–50 km/h | 1,59 s | 1,56 stight gap |
| 0–80 km/h | 2,55 s | 2,51 stight gap |
| 0–100 km/h | 3,33 s | 3,21 stight gap |
| 0–120 km/h | 4,32 s | 4,11 s |
| 0–160 km/h | 7,15 s | 6,58 s |
| 0–200 km/h | 11,16 s | 10,02 s |
| 400 m standing start | 11,32 s | 11,02 s |
| 1,000 m standing start | 20,60 s | 20,06 s |
| Top speed limited | 250 km/h | 250 km/h |
Manufacturer technical specifications. The power-to-weight ratio is the key physical factor in a drag race.
| Characteristic | Value | Detail |
|---|---|---|
| Power | 671 hp | Pending |
| Torque | 830 Nm | |
| Weight | 2 395 kg | manufacturer kerb weight |
| Drivetrain | Integrale (AWD) | |
| Gearbox | Unknown |
| Characteristic | Value | Detail |
|---|---|---|
| Power | 670 hp | Dual Permanent Magnet Synchronous Motor |
| Torque | 908 Nm | |
| Weight | 2 069 kg | manufacturer kerb weight |
| Drivetrain | Integrale (AWD) | |
| Gearbox | Single-speed fixed gear |
Off the line, the Model S Long Range hits 100 km/h in 3.22 s versus 3.33 s for the RS e-tron GT. The 0.12 s gap is negligible: both vehicles are neck and neck.
At 200 metres, the Model S Long Range is doing 169 km/h against 163 km/h for the RS e-tron GT. The gap is 0.15 s. The gap remains stable from the start.
At 400 metres standing start, the Model S Long Range crosses the line in 11.02 s versus 11.31 s. The 0.30 s gap represents roughly 16 m of track — two to three car lengths.
Past 400 metres, the Model S Long Range continues to build its lead. At 600 metres, it runs at 237 km/h versus 227 km/h. At 1,000 metres, the Model S Long Range finishes in 20.05 s versus 20.60 s, with a 0.55 s lead. Both vehicles have similar top speeds (250 (i.e. 155 mph — industry threshold) vs 250 (i.e. 155 mph — industry threshold) km/h), preventing any comeback.
Both rivals share the same electronic speed cap: the RS e-tron GT and the Model S Long Range are governed to 250 (i.e. 155 mph — industry threshold) km/h. At that speed, standard-fit tyres approach their safety threshold — an industrial ceiling common to most electric vehicles in this segment. Neither car shows its true aerodynamic potential in this duel.
With two electric powertrains, the difference comes down to power-to-weight ratio (3.57 kg/hp vs 3.09 kg/hp) and transmission (Unknown vs Automatic).
In European road use (130 km/h max), both vehicles reach the legal speed limit in under 4.92 seconds. The 0.12 s difference in 0 to 100 km/h is mostly felt in motorway merging and overtaking.
Swap one of the two models to explore an equivalent duel in the same segment.
Sur 0–100 km/h, Model S Long Range gagne (3,21 s vs 3,33 s).
RS e-tron GT passe de 0 à 100 km/h en 3,33 secondes (simulation calibrée).
RS e-tron GT : 671 hp, ratio 3,57 kg/hp. Model S Long Range : 670 hp, ratio 3,09 kg/hp.
RS e-tron GT : 250 km/h. Model S Long Range : 250 km/h.