Over 0–100 km/h, Stelvio Veloce wins (5,76 s vs 9,13 s).
Performance comparison
Simulated drag race 0 → 1,000 m in real time. Synchronised speed counters and stopwatch. Physics calibration on 7 manufacturer measurements.
Simulation
Calibration
Physics model calibrated on manufacturer splits. The limited top speed is not the real aerodynamic top speed of the vehicles.
| Stelvio Veloce | 318d F30 | |
|---|---|---|
| 0–100 km/h | 5,76 s−3,37 s | 9,13 s |
| 400 m standing start | 14,12 s−2,44 s | 16,56 s |
| 1,000 m standing start | 26,01 s−4,50 s | 30,51 s |
| Top speed (electronically limited) | 230 km/h+21 km/h | 209 km/h |
| Power-to-weight ratio | 6,59 kg/hpbetter ratio | 10,45 kg/hp |
Standing-start drag race, calibrated on manufacturer splits. The gap shows at each stage.
Simulated performance at each stage. Winner in green.
| Palier | Stelvio Veloce | 318d F30 |
|---|---|---|
| 0–30 km/h | 1,32 s | 1,65 s |
| 0–50 km/h | 2,24 s | 3,00 s |
| 0–80 km/h | 4,12 s | 6,15 s |
| 0–100 km/h | 5,76 s | 9,13 s |
| 0–120 km/h | 7,99 s | 12,95 s |
| 0–160 km/h | 14,32 s | 25,23 s |
| 0–200 km/h | 26,33 s | 61,46 s |
| 400 m standing start | 14,12 s | 16,56 s |
| 1,000 m standing start | 26,01 s | 30,51 s |
| Top speed | 230 km/h | 209 km/h |
Manufacturer technical specifications. The power-to-weight ratio is the key physical factor in a drag race.
| Characteristic | Value | Detail |
|---|---|---|
| Power | 280 hp | Pending |
| Torque | 400 Nm | |
| Weight | 1 845 kg | manufacturer kerb weight |
| Drivetrain | - | |
| Gearbox | 8-speed automatic |
| Characteristic | Value | Detail |
|---|---|---|
| Power | 143 hp | Pending |
| Torque | 320 Nm | |
| Weight | 1 495 kg | manufacturer kerb weight |
| Drivetrain | Propulsion | |
| Gearbox | 8-speed automatic (Steptronic) |
Off the line, the Stelvio Veloce hits 100 km/h in 5.76 s versus 9.13 s for the Bmw 318d. At this point, the Stelvio Veloce leads by 3.37 s and sits roughly 20 m ahead.
At 200 metres, the Stelvio Veloce is doing 129 km/h against 109 km/h for the Bmw 318d. The gap is 1.54 s. The challenger starts to claw back ground.
At 400 metres standing start, the Stelvio Veloce crosses the line in 14.12 s versus 16.56 s. The 2.44 s gap represents roughly 88 m of track - a gap visible to the naked eye.
Past 400 metres, the Stelvio Veloce continues to build its lead. At 600 metres, it runs at 177 km/h versus 151 km/h. At 1,000 metres, the Stelvio Veloce finishes in 26.01 s versus 30.51 s, with a 4.50 s lead.
Both rivals are electronically governed, but not at the same level: the Stelvio Veloce is capped at 230 km/h, the Bmw 318d at 210 km/h. This isn’t a physical engine limit - it’s a manufacturer choice, usually for tyre safety or homologation reasons. Neither car reaches its true aerodynamic top speed.
With two combustion powertrains, the difference comes down to power-to-weight ratio (6.59 kg/hp vs 10.45 kg/hp) and transmission (Automatic vs Automatic).
In European road use (130 km/h max), both vehicles reach the legal speed limit in under 15.33 seconds. The 3.37 s difference in 0 to 100 km/h is mostly felt in motorway merging and overtaking.
Over 0–100 km/h, Stelvio Veloce wins (5,76 s vs 9,13 s).
Stelvio Veloce goes from 0 to 100 km/h in 5,76 seconds (calibrated simulation).
Stelvio Veloce: 280 hp, ratio 6,59 kg/hp. 318d F30: 143 hp, ratio 10,45 kg/hp.
Stelvio Veloce: 230 km/h. 318d F30: 209 km/h.