Sur 0–100 km/h, Z4 M40i G29 gagne (4,54 s vs 4,55 s).
Performance comparison
Simulated drag race 0 → 1,000 m in real time. Synchronised speed counters and stopwatch. Physics calibration on 7 manufacturer measurements.
Simulation
Calibration
Physics model calibrated on manufacturer splits. The limited top speed is not the real aerodynamic top speed of the vehicles.
| Z4 M40i G29 | A110 Pure 252 | |
|---|---|---|
| 0–100 km/h | 4,54 s−0,01 s | 4,55 s |
| 400 m standing start | 12,70 s | 12,62 s+0,08 s |
| 1,000 m standing start | 22,95 s | 22,69 s+0,26 s |
| Top speed (electronically limited) | 250 km/h | 277 km/h−27 km/h |
| Power-to-weight ratio | 4,51 kg/hp | 4,31 kg/hpbetter ratio |
Standing-start drag race, calibrated on manufacturer splits. The gap shows at each stage.
Simulated performance at each stage. Winner in green.
| Palier | Z4 M40i G29 | A110 Pure 252 |
|---|---|---|
| 0–30 km/h | 1,27 s | 1,34 stight gap |
| 0–50 km/h | 2,12 s | 2,24 stight gap |
| 0–80 km/h | 3,42 s | 3,55 stight gap |
| 0–100 km/h | 4,54 s | 4,55 stight gap |
| 0–120 km/h | 5,95 s | 5,87 stight gap |
| 0–160 km/h | 9,74 s | 9,32 s |
| 0–200 km/h | 15,46 s | 14,57 s |
| 400 m standing start | 12,70 s | 12,62 stight gap |
| 1,000 m standing start | 22,95 s | 22,69 s |
| Top speed limited | 250 km/h | 277 km/h |
Manufacturer technical specifications. The power-to-weight ratio is the key physical factor in a drag race.
| Characteristic | Value | Detail |
|---|---|---|
| Power | 340 hp | 6 cyl |
| Torque | 500 Nm | |
| Weight | 1 535 kg | manufacturer kerb weight |
| Drivetrain | — | |
| Gearbox | Eight-speed Steptronic transmission |
| Characteristic | Value | Detail |
|---|---|---|
| Power | 256 hp | Pending |
| Torque | 320 Nm | |
| Weight | 1 103 kg | manufacturer kerb weight |
| Drivetrain | — | |
| Gearbox | 7-speed dual-clutch |
Off the line, the Bmw Z4 M40i hits 100 km/h in 4.54 s versus 4.56 s for the A110 Pure 252. The 0.01 s gap is negligible: both vehicles are neck and neck.
At 200 metres, the Bmw Z4 M40i is doing 147 km/h against 151 km/h for the A110 Pure 252. The gap is 0.02 s. The gap remains stable from the start.
At 400 metres standing start, the A110 Pure 252 crosses the line in 12.61 s versus 12.70 s. The 0.08 s gap represents roughly 4 m of track — barely a car length.
Past 400 metres, the A110 Pure 252 continues to build its lead. At 600 metres, it runs at 209 km/h versus 205 km/h. At 1,000 metres, the A110 Pure 252 finishes in 22.69 s versus 22.95 s, with a 0.26 s lead.
Electronically capped at 250 (i.e. 155 mph — industry threshold) km/h, the Bmw Z4 M40i never reaches its natural aerodynamic ceiling in this duel. That’s not a physical limit of the motor — it’s a deliberate manufacturer decision, typically tied to standard-fit tyre ratings or model-range positioning.
With two combustion powertrains, the difference comes down to power-to-weight ratio (4.51 kg/hp vs 4.31 kg/hp) and transmission (Automatic vs Automatic).
In European road use (130 km/h max), both vehicles reach the legal speed limit in under 6.76 seconds. The 0.01 s difference in 0 to 100 km/h is mostly felt in motorway merging and overtaking.
Swap one of the two models to explore an equivalent duel in the same segment.
Sur 0–100 km/h, Z4 M40i G29 gagne (4,54 s vs 4,55 s).
Z4 M40i G29 passe de 0 à 100 km/h en 4,54 secondes (simulation calibrée).
Z4 M40i G29 : 340 hp, ratio 4,51 kg/hp. A110 Pure 252 : 256 hp, ratio 4,31 kg/hp.
Z4 M40i G29 : 250 km/h. A110 Pure 252 : 277 km/h.