Sur 0–100 km/h, 320d G20 gagne (6,83 s vs 7,72 s).
Performance comparison
Simulated drag race 0 → 1,000 m in real time. Synchronised speed counters and stopwatch. Physics calibration on 7 manufacturer measurements.
Simulation
Calibration
Physics model calibrated on manufacturer splits. The limited top speed is not the real aerodynamic top speed of the vehicles.
| A5 Avant | 320d G20 | |
|---|---|---|
| 0–100 km/h | 7,72 s | 6,83 s+0,89 s |
| 400 m standing start | 15,71 s | 14,96 s+0,75 s |
| 1,000 m standing start | 27,94 s | 27,60 s+0,34 s |
| Top speed (electronically limited) | 245 km/h+5 km/h | 240 km/h |
| Power-to-weight ratio | 8,38 kg/hp | 8,11 kg/hpbetter ratio |
Standing-start drag race, calibrated on manufacturer splits. The gap shows at each stage.
Simulated performance at each stage. Winner in green.
| Palier | A5 Avant | 320d G20 |
|---|---|---|
| 0–30 km/h | 2,12 s | 1,25 s |
| 0–50 km/h | 3,53 s | 2,27 s |
| 0–80 km/h | 5,76 s | 4,65 s |
| 0–100 km/h | 7,72 s | 6,83 s |
| 0–120 km/h | 10,23 s | 9,65 s |
| 0–160 km/h | 17,35 s | 17,86 s |
| 0–200 km/h | 29,43 s | 32,75 s |
| 400 m standing start | 15,71 s | 14,96 s |
| 1,000 m standing start | 27,94 s | 27,60 s |
| Top speed | 245 km/h | 240 km/h |
Manufacturer technical specifications. The power-to-weight ratio is the key physical factor in a drag race.
| Characteristic | Value | Detail |
|---|---|---|
| Power | 204 hp | Pending |
| Torque | 340 Nm | |
| Weight | 1 710 kg | manufacturer kerb weight |
| Drivetrain | Traction | |
| Gearbox | 7-speed S tronic |
| Characteristic | Value | Detail |
|---|---|---|
| Power | 190 hp | 4 cyl |
| Torque | 400 Nm | |
| Weight | 1 540 kg | manufacturer kerb weight |
| Drivetrain | — | |
| Gearbox | eight-speed Steptronic transmission |
Off the line, the Bmw 320d hits 100 km/h in 6.83 s versus 7.72 s for the A5 Avant. At this point, the Bmw 320d leads by 0.89 s and sits roughly 24 m ahead.
At 200 metres, the Bmw 320d is doing 120 km/h against 122 km/h for the A5 Avant. The gap is 0.88 s. The gap remains stable from the start.
At 400 metres standing start, the Bmw 320d crosses the line in 14.95 s versus 15.70 s. The 0.75 s gap represents roughly 31 m of track — a gap visible to the naked eye.
Past 400 metres, the gap narrows. The Bmw 320d maxes out at 240 km/h while the A5 Avant keeps accelerating towards 245 km/h. At 600 metres, the gap is down to 0.61 s from 0.75 s at 400 metres.
At 1,000 metres, the Bmw 320d finishes in 27.60 s versus 27.94 s, with just 0.34 s to spare. The A5 Avant fails to fully close the launch gap.
Both rivals are electronically governed, but not at the same level: the A5 Avant is capped at 245 km/h, the Bmw 320d at 240 km/h. This isn’t a physical engine limit — it’s a manufacturer choice, usually for tyre safety or homologation reasons. Neither car reaches its true aerodynamic top speed.
With two combustion powertrains, the difference comes down to power-to-weight ratio (8.38 kg/hp vs 8.11 kg/hp) and transmission (Automatic vs Automatic).
In European road use (130 km/h max), both vehicles reach the legal speed limit in under 11.72 seconds. The 0.89 s difference in 0 to 100 km/h is mostly felt in motorway merging and overtaking.
Swap one of the two models to explore an equivalent duel in the same segment.
Sur 0–100 km/h, 320d G20 gagne (6,83 s vs 7,72 s).
A5 Avant passe de 0 à 100 km/h en 7,72 secondes (simulation calibrée).
A5 Avant : 204 hp, ratio 8,38 kg/hp. 320d G20 : 190 hp, ratio 8,11 kg/hp.
A5 Avant : 245 km/h. 320d G20 : 240 km/h.