Sur 0–100 km/h, Q7 SUV gagne (7,07 s vs 7,22 s).
Performance comparison
Simulated drag race 0 → 1,000 m in real time. Synchronised speed counters and stopwatch. Physics calibration on 7 manufacturer measurements.
Simulation
Calibration
Physics model calibrated on manufacturer splits. The limited top speed is not the real aerodynamic top speed of the vehicles.
| Q7 SUV | X1 xDrive20i F48 | |
|---|---|---|
| 0–100 km/h | 7,07 s−0,15 s | 7,22 s |
| 400 m standing start | 15,11 s−0,13 s | 15,24 s |
| 1,000 m standing start | 28,09 s | 28,05 s+0,04 s |
| Top speed (electronically limited) | 226 km/h+3 km/h | 223 km/h |
| Power-to-weight ratio | 9,09 kg/hp | 8,88 kg/hpbetter ratio |
Standing-start drag race, calibrated on manufacturer splits. The gap shows at each stage.
Simulated performance at each stage. Winner in green.
| Palier | Q7 SUV | X1 xDrive20i F48 |
|---|---|---|
| 0–30 km/h | 1,17 s | 1,33 s |
| 0–50 km/h | 2,22 s | 2,47 s |
| 0–80 km/h | 4,70 s | 4,99 s |
| 0–100 km/h | 7,07 s | 7,22 stight gap |
| 0–120 km/h | 10,12 s | 10,18 stight gap |
| 0–160 km/h | 19,20 s | 18,68 s |
| 0–200 km/h | 37,54 s | 35,74 s |
| 400 m standing start | 15,11 s | 15,24 stight gap |
| 1,000 m standing start | 28,09 s | 28,05 stight gap |
| Top speed | 226 km/h | 223 km/h |
Manufacturer technical specifications. The power-to-weight ratio is the key physical factor in a drag race.
| Characteristic | Value | Detail |
|---|---|---|
| Power | 231 hp | |
| Torque | 500 Nm | |
| Weight | 2 100 kg | manufacturer kerb weight |
| Drivetrain | Integrale (AWD) | |
| Gearbox | 8-speed tiptronic |
| Characteristic | Value | Detail |
|---|---|---|
| Power | 178 hp | |
| Torque | 280 Nm | |
| Weight | 1 580 kg | manufacturer kerb weight |
| Drivetrain | Integrale (AWD) | |
| Gearbox | 8-speed Steptronic |
Off the line, the Q7 SUV hits 100 km/h in 7.07 s versus 7.22 s for the Bmw X1 xDrive20i. At this point, the Q7 SUV leads by 0.15 s and sits roughly 5 m ahead.
At 200 metres, the Q7 SUV is doing 117 km/h against 118 km/h for the Bmw X1 xDrive20i. The gap is 0.17 s. The gap remains stable from the start.
At 400 metres standing start, the Q7 SUV crosses the line in 15.11 s versus 15.24 s. The 0.13 s gap represents roughly 5 m of track — barely a car length.
Past 400 metres, the situation changes. Past 400 metres, both rivals hit the same electronic ceiling at 223 km/h. Neither can claw back ground through top speed — the outcome hinges on the acceleration curve between 100 and 223 km/h.
At 1,000 metres, the Bmw X1 xDrive20i finishes in 28.05 s versus 28.09 s. The 0.04 s delta shows an extremely tight race.
Both rivals are electronically governed, but not at the same level: the Q7 SUV is capped at 226 km/h, the Bmw X1 xDrive20i at 223 km/h. This isn’t a physical engine limit — it’s a manufacturer choice, usually for tyre safety or homologation reasons. Neither car reaches its true aerodynamic top speed.
With two combustion powertrains, the difference comes down to power-to-weight ratio (9.09 kg/hp vs 8.88 kg/hp) and transmission (Automatic vs Automatic).
In European road use (130 km/h max), both vehicles reach the legal speed limit in under 11.95 seconds. The 0.15 s difference in 0 to 100 km/h is mostly felt in motorway merging and overtaking.
Swap one of the two models to explore an equivalent duel in the same segment.
Sur 0–100 km/h, Q7 SUV gagne (7,07 s vs 7,22 s).
Q7 SUV passe de 0 à 100 km/h en 7,07 secondes (simulation calibrée).
Q7 SUV : 231 hp, ratio 9,09 kg/hp. X1 xDrive20i F48 : 178 hp, ratio 8,88 kg/hp.
Q7 SUV : 226 km/h. X1 xDrive20i F48 : 223 km/h.