Sur 0–100 km/h, RS 3 Sportback gagne (3,88 s vs 4,45 s).
Performance comparison
Simulated drag race 0 → 1,000 m in real time. Synchronised speed counters and stopwatch. Physics calibration on 7 manufacturer measurements.
Simulation
Calibration
Physics model calibrated on manufacturer splits. The limited top speed is not the real aerodynamic top speed of the vehicles.
| RS 3 Sportback | M240i xDrive F22 | |
|---|---|---|
| 0–100 km/h | 3,88 s−0,58 s | 4,45 s |
| 400 m standing start | 12,08 s−0,59 s | 12,67 s |
| 1,000 m standing start | 22,05 s−0,98 s | 23,03 s |
| Top speed (electronically limited) | 250 km/h | 250 km/h |
| Power-to-weight ratio | 3,91 kg/hpbetter ratio | 4,53 kg/hp |
Standing-start drag race, calibrated on manufacturer splits. The gap shows at each stage.
Simulated performance at each stage. Winner in green.
| Palier | RS 3 Sportback | M240i xDrive F22 |
|---|---|---|
| 0–30 km/h | 1,04 s | 1,23 s |
| 0–50 km/h | 1,74 s | 2,02 s |
| 0–80 km/h | 2,85 s | 3,32 s |
| 0–100 km/h | 3,88 s | 4,45 s |
| 0–120 km/h | 5,07 s | 5,88 s |
| 0–160 km/h | 8,84 s | 9,85 s |
| 0–200 km/h | 13,81 s | 15,84 s |
| 400 m standing start | 12,08 s | 12,67 s |
| 1,000 m standing start | 22,05 s | 23,03 s |
| Top speed limited | 250 km/h | 250 km/h |
Manufacturer technical specifications. The power-to-weight ratio is the key physical factor in a drag race.
| Characteristic | Value | Detail |
|---|---|---|
| Power | 400 hp | Pending |
| Torque | 500 Nm | |
| Weight | 1 565 kg | manufacturer kerb weight |
| Drivetrain | Integrale (AWD) | |
| Gearbox | 7-speed S tronic |
| Characteristic | Value | Detail |
|---|---|---|
| Power | 340 hp | 6 cyl |
| Torque | 500 Nm | |
| Weight | 1 540 kg | manufacturer kerb weight |
| Drivetrain | Integrale (AWD) | |
| Gearbox | 8-speed Steptronic |
Off the line, the RS 3 Sportback hits 100 km/h in 3.88 s versus 4.45 s for the Bmw M240i xDrive. At this point, the RS 3 Sportback leads by 0.58 s and sits roughly 7 m ahead.
At 200 metres, the RS 3 Sportback is doing 150 km/h against 147 km/h for the Bmw M240i xDrive. The gap is 0.45 s. The challenger starts to claw back ground.
At 400 metres standing start, the RS 3 Sportback crosses the line in 12.08 s versus 12.66 s. The 0.58 s gap represents roughly 29 m of track — two to three car lengths.
Past 400 metres, the RS 3 Sportback continues to build its lead. At 600 metres, it runs at 211 km/h versus 203 km/h. At 1,000 metres, the RS 3 Sportback finishes in 22.04 s versus 23.03 s, with a 0.98 s lead. Both vehicles have similar top speeds (250 (i.e. 155 mph — industry threshold) vs 250 (i.e. 155 mph — industry threshold) km/h), preventing any comeback.
Both rivals share the same electronic speed cap: the RS 3 Sportback and the Bmw M240i xDrive are governed to 250 (i.e. 155 mph — industry threshold) km/h. At that speed, standard-fit tyres approach their safety threshold — an industrial ceiling common to most electric vehicles in this segment. Neither car shows its true aerodynamic potential in this duel.
With two combustion powertrains, the difference comes down to power-to-weight ratio (3.91 kg/hp vs 4.53 kg/hp) and transmission (Automatic vs Automatic).
In European road use (130 km/h max), both vehicles reach the legal speed limit in under 6.72 seconds. The 0.58 s difference in 0 to 100 km/h is mostly felt in motorway merging and overtaking.
Swap one of the two models to explore an equivalent duel in the same segment.
Sur 0–100 km/h, RS 3 Sportback gagne (3,88 s vs 4,45 s).
RS 3 Sportback passe de 0 à 100 km/h en 3,88 secondes (simulation calibrée).
RS 3 Sportback : 400 hp, ratio 3,91 kg/hp. M240i xDrive F22 : 340 hp, ratio 4,53 kg/hp.
RS 3 Sportback : 250 km/h. M240i xDrive F22 : 250 km/h.