Sur 0–100 km/h, RS 5 Avant gagne (3,66 s vs 6,28 s).
Performance comparison
Simulated drag race 0 → 1,000 m in real time. Synchronised speed counters and stopwatch. Physics calibration on 7 manufacturer measurements.
Simulation
Calibration
Physics model calibrated on manufacturer splits. The limited top speed is not the real aerodynamic top speed of the vehicles.
| RS 5 Avant | 530e iPerformance G30 | |
|---|---|---|
| 0–100 km/h | 3,66 s−2,63 s | 6,28 s |
| 400 m standing start | 11,72 s−2,68 s | 14,40 s |
| 1,000 m standing start | 21,36 s−4,95 s | 26,31 s |
| Top speed (electronically limited) | 250 km/h+15 km/h | 235 km/h |
| Power-to-weight ratio | 3,71 kg/hpbetter ratio | 7,02 kg/hp |
Standing-start drag race, calibrated on manufacturer splits. The gap shows at each stage.
Simulated performance at each stage. Winner in green.
| Palier | RS 5 Avant | 530e iPerformance G30 |
|---|---|---|
| 0–30 km/h | 0,97 s | 1,41 s |
| 0–50 km/h | 1,61 s | 2,35 s |
| 0–80 km/h | 2,67 s | 4,29 s |
| 0–100 km/h | 3,66 s | 6,28 s |
| 0–120 km/h | 4,82 s | 8,42 s |
| 0–160 km/h | 7,97 s | 14,95 s |
| 0–200 km/h | 12,48 s | 26,50 s |
| 400 m standing start | 11,72 s | 14,40 s |
| 1,000 m standing start | 21,36 s | 26,31 s |
| Top speed limited | 250 km/h | 235 km/h |
Manufacturer technical specifications. The power-to-weight ratio is the key physical factor in a drag race.
| Characteristic | Value | Detail |
|---|---|---|
| Power | 639 hp | Pending |
| Torque | 825 Nm | |
| Weight | 2 370 kg | manufacturer kerb weight |
| Drivetrain | Integrale (AWD) | |
| Gearbox | 8-speed tiptronic |
| Characteristic | Value | Detail |
|---|---|---|
| Power | 252 hp | 4 cyl |
| Torque | 290 Nm | |
| Weight | 1 770 kg | manufacturer kerb weight |
| Drivetrain | Propulsion | |
| Gearbox | 8-speed Steptronic |
Off the line, the RS 5 Avant hits 100 km/h in 3.66 s versus 6.28 s for the Bmw 530e iPerformance. At this point, the RS 5 Avant leads by 2.63 s and sits roughly 17 m ahead.
At 200 metres, the RS 5 Avant is doing 156 km/h against 127 km/h for the Bmw 530e iPerformance. The gap is 1.74 s. The challenger starts to claw back ground.
At 400 metres standing start, the RS 5 Avant crosses the line in 11.72 s versus 14.39 s. The 2.68 s gap represents roughly 112 m of track — a gap visible to the naked eye.
Past 400 metres, the RS 5 Avant continues to build its lead. At 600 metres, it runs at 218 km/h versus 176 km/h. At 1,000 metres, the RS 5 Avant finishes in 21.35 s versus 26.31 s, with a 4.95 s lead.
The RS 5 Avant features all-wheel drive (AWD) against the Bmw 530e iPerformance’s RWD. At low speeds (0-30, 0-50, 0-80 km/h), AWD doubles the driven contact area: all four wheels transmit torque to the road, virtually eliminating wheelspin at launch. This traction advantage is decisive in the range where the motor delivers peak torque, before power and aerodynamics take over.
Both rivals are electronically governed, but not at the same level: the RS 5 Avant is capped at 250 (i.e. 155 mph — industry threshold) km/h, the Bmw 530e iPerformance at 235 km/h. This isn’t a physical engine limit — it’s a manufacturer choice, usually for tyre safety or homologation reasons. Neither car reaches its true aerodynamic top speed.
With two plug-in hybrid powertrains, the difference comes down to power-to-weight ratio (3.71 kg/hp vs 7.02 kg/hp) and transmission (Automatic vs Automatic).
In European road use (130 km/h max), both vehicles reach the legal speed limit in under 9.82 seconds. The 2.63 s difference in 0 to 100 km/h is mostly felt in motorway merging and overtaking.
Swap one of the two models to explore an equivalent duel in the same segment.
Sur 0–100 km/h, RS 5 Avant gagne (3,66 s vs 6,28 s).
RS 5 Avant passe de 0 à 100 km/h en 3,66 secondes (simulation calibrée).
RS 5 Avant : 639 hp, ratio 3,71 kg/hp. 530e iPerformance G30 : 252 hp, ratio 7,02 kg/hp.
RS 5 Avant : 250 km/h. 530e iPerformance G30 : 235 km/h.