Sur 0–100 km/h, RS 5 Sedan gagne (3,73 s vs 4,67 s).
Performance comparison
Simulated drag race 0 → 1,000 m in real time. Synchronised speed counters and stopwatch. Physics calibration on 7 manufacturer measurements.
Simulation
Calibration
Physics model calibrated on manufacturer splits. The limited top speed is not the real aerodynamic top speed of the vehicles.
| RS 5 Sedan | 545e xDrive G30 | |
|---|---|---|
| 0–100 km/h | 3,73 s−0,94 s | 4,67 s |
| 400 m standing start | 11,78 s−1,14 s | 12,92 s |
| 1,000 m standing start | 21,38 s−2,02 s | 23,40 s |
| Top speed (electronically limited) | 250 km/h | 250 km/h |
| Power-to-weight ratio | 3,69 kg/hpbetter ratio | 4,94 kg/hp |
Standing-start drag race, calibrated on manufacturer splits. The gap shows at each stage.
Simulated performance at each stage. Winner in green.
| Palier | RS 5 Sedan | 545e xDrive G30 |
|---|---|---|
| 0–30 km/h | 1,01 s | 1,21 s |
| 0–50 km/h | 1,68 s | 2,02 s |
| 0–80 km/h | 2,74 s | 3,41 s |
| 0–100 km/h | 3,73 s | 4,67 s |
| 0–120 km/h | 4,89 s | 6,25 s |
| 0–160 km/h | 8,03 s | 10,49 s |
| 0–200 km/h | 12,49 s | 16,71 s |
| 400 m standing start | 11,78 s | 12,92 s |
| 1,000 m standing start | 21,38 s | 23,40 s |
| Top speed limited | 250 km/h | 250 km/h |
Manufacturer technical specifications. The power-to-weight ratio is the key physical factor in a drag race.
| Characteristic | Value | Detail |
|---|---|---|
| Power | 639 hp | Pending |
| Torque | 825 Nm | |
| Weight | 2 355 kg | manufacturer kerb weight |
| Drivetrain | Integrale (AWD) | |
| Gearbox | 8-speed tiptronic |
| Characteristic | Value | Detail |
|---|---|---|
| Power | 394 hp | 6 cyl |
| Torque | 600 Nm | |
| Weight | 1 945 kg | manufacturer kerb weight |
| Drivetrain | Integrale (AWD) | |
| Gearbox | Eight-speed Steptronic transmission |
Off the line, the RS 5 Sedan hits 100 km/h in 3.73 s versus 4.68 s for the Bmw 545e xDrive. At this point, the RS 5 Sedan leads by 0.94 s and sits roughly 9 m ahead.
At 200 metres, the RS 5 Sedan is doing 156 km/h against 143 km/h for the Bmw 545e xDrive. The gap is 0.75 s. The challenger starts to claw back ground.
At 400 metres standing start, the RS 5 Sedan crosses the line in 11.77 s versus 12.91 s. The 1.14 s gap represents roughly 55 m of track — a gap visible to the naked eye.
Past 400 metres, the RS 5 Sedan continues to build its lead. At 600 metres, it runs at 218 km/h versus 200 km/h. At 1,000 metres, the RS 5 Sedan finishes in 21.38 s versus 23.40 s, with a 2.02 s lead. Both vehicles have similar top speeds (250 (i.e. 155 mph — industry threshold) vs 250 (i.e. 155 mph — industry threshold) km/h), preventing any comeback.
Both rivals share the same electronic speed cap: the RS 5 Sedan and the Bmw 545e xDrive are governed to 250 (i.e. 155 mph — industry threshold) km/h. At that speed, standard-fit tyres approach their safety threshold — an industrial ceiling common to most electric vehicles in this segment. Neither car shows its true aerodynamic potential in this duel.
With two plug-in hybrid powertrains, the difference comes down to power-to-weight ratio (3.69 kg/hp vs 4.94 kg/hp) and transmission (Automatic vs Automatic).
In European road use (130 km/h max), both vehicles reach the legal speed limit in under 7.16 seconds. The 0.94 s difference in 0 to 100 km/h is mostly felt in motorway merging and overtaking.
Swap one of the two models to explore an equivalent duel in the same segment.
Sur 0–100 km/h, RS 5 Sedan gagne (3,73 s vs 4,67 s).
RS 5 Sedan passe de 0 à 100 km/h en 3,73 secondes (simulation calibrée).
RS 5 Sedan : 639 hp, ratio 3,69 kg/hp. 545e xDrive G30 : 394 hp, ratio 4,94 kg/hp.
RS 5 Sedan : 250 km/h. 545e xDrive G30 : 250 km/h.