Over 0–100 km/h, SQ7 SUV wins (4,04 s vs 4,94 s).
Performance comparison
Simulated drag race 0 → 1,000 m in real time. Synchronised speed counters and stopwatch. Physics calibration on 7 manufacturer measurements.
Simulation
Calibration
Physics model calibrated on manufacturer splits. The limited top speed is not the real aerodynamic top speed of the vehicles.
| SQ7 SUV | X4 M40d G02 | |
|---|---|---|
| 0–100 km/h | 4,04 s−0,90 s | 4,94 s |
| 400 m standing start | 12,11 s−1,18 s | 13,29 s |
| 1,000 m standing start | 21,94 s−2,45 s | 24,39 s |
| Top speed (electronically limited) | 250 km/h | 250 km/h |
| Power-to-weight ratio | 4,34 kg/hpbetter ratio | 5,81 kg/hp |
Standing-start drag race, calibrated on manufacturer splits. The gap shows at each stage.
Simulated performance at each stage. Winner in green.
| Palier | SQ7 SUV | X4 M40d G02 |
|---|---|---|
| 0–30 km/h | 1,14 s | 1,25 stight gap |
| 0–50 km/h | 1,90 s | 2,02 stight gap |
| 0–80 km/h | 3,07 s | 3,53 s |
| 0–100 km/h | 4,04 s | 4,94 s |
| 0–120 km/h | 5,24 s | 6,72 s |
| 0–160 km/h | 8,52 s | 11,71 s |
| 0–200 km/h | 13,41 s | 19,89 s |
| 400 m standing start | 12,11 s | 13,29 s |
| 1,000 m standing start | 21,94 s | 24,39 s |
| Top speed limited | 250 km/h | 250 km/h |
Manufacturer technical specifications. The power-to-weight ratio is the key physical factor in a drag race.
| Characteristic | Value | Detail |
|---|---|---|
| Power | 507 hp | Pending |
| Torque | 770 Nm | |
| Weight | 2 200 kg | manufacturer kerb weight |
| Drivetrain | Integrale (AWD) | |
| Gearbox | 8-speed tiptronic |
| Characteristic | Value | Detail |
|---|---|---|
| Power | 326 hp | 6 cyl |
| Torque | 680 Nm | |
| Weight | 1 895 kg | manufacturer kerb weight |
| Drivetrain | Integrale (AWD) | |
| Gearbox | 8-speed Steptronic |
Off the line, the SQ7 SUV hits 100 km/h in 4.04 s versus 4.94 s for the Bmw X4 M40d. At this point, the SQ7 SUV leads by 0.90 s and sits roughly 6 m ahead.
At 200 metres, the SQ7 SUV is doing 154 km/h against 137 km/h for the Bmw X4 M40d. The gap is 0.67 s. The challenger starts to claw back ground.
At 400 metres standing start, the SQ7 SUV crosses the line in 12.11 s versus 13.29 s. The 1.18 s gap represents roughly 54 m of track - a gap visible to the naked eye.
Past 400 metres, the SQ7 SUV continues to build its lead. At 600 metres, it runs at 214 km/h versus 190 km/h. At 1,000 metres, the SQ7 SUV finishes in 21.94 s versus 24.38 s, with a 2.44 s lead. Both vehicles have similar top speeds (250 (i.e. 155 mph - industry threshold) vs 250 (i.e. 155 mph - industry threshold) km/h), preventing any comeback.
Both rivals share the same electronic speed cap: the SQ7 SUV and the Bmw X4 M40d are governed to 250 (i.e. 155 mph - industry threshold) km/h. At that speed, standard-fit tyres approach their safety threshold - an industrial ceiling common to most electric vehicles in this segment. Neither car shows its true aerodynamic potential in this duel.
With two combustion powertrains, the difference comes down to power-to-weight ratio (4.34 kg/hp vs 5.81 kg/hp) and transmission (Automatic vs Automatic).
In European road use (130 km/h max), both vehicles reach the legal speed limit in under 7.77 seconds. The 0.90 s difference in 0 to 100 km/h is mostly felt in motorway merging and overtaking.
Over 0–100 km/h, SQ7 SUV wins (4,04 s vs 4,94 s).
SQ7 SUV goes from 0 to 100 km/h in 4,04 seconds (calibrated simulation).
SQ7 SUV: 507 hp, ratio 4,34 kg/hp. X4 M40d G02: 326 hp, ratio 5,81 kg/hp.
SQ7 SUV: 250 km/h. X4 M40d G02: 250 km/h.