Sur 0–100 km/h, 128ti F40 gagne (6,27 s vs 8,19 s).
Performance comparison
Simulated drag race 0 → 1,000 m in real time. Synchronised speed counters and stopwatch. Physics calibration on 7 manufacturer measurements.
Simulation
Calibration
Physics model calibrated on manufacturer splits. The limited top speed is not the real aerodynamic top speed of the vehicles.
| 128ti F40 | A3 Sportback | |
|---|---|---|
| 0–100 km/h | 6,27 s−1,92 s | 8,19 s |
| 400 m standing start | 14,44 s−1,52 s | 15,96 s |
| 1,000 m standing start | 25,87 s−3,12 s | 28,99 s |
| Top speed (electronically limited) | 250 km/h+18 km/h | 232 km/h |
| Power-to-weight ratio | 5,45 kg/hpbetter ratio | 9,40 kg/hp |
Standing-start drag race, calibrated on manufacturer splits. The gap shows at each stage.
Simulated performance at each stage. Winner in green.
| Palier | 128ti F40 | A3 Sportback |
|---|---|---|
| 0–30 km/h | 1,81 s | 1,83 stight gap |
| 0–50 km/h | 3,01 s | 3,06 stight gap |
| 0–80 km/h | 4,76 s | 5,62 s |
| 0–100 km/h | 6,27 s | 8,19 s |
| 0–120 km/h | 8,20 s | 11,23 s |
| 0–160 km/h | 13,63 s | 20,30 s |
| 0–200 km/h | 22,97 s | 38,18 s |
| 400 m standing start | 14,44 s | 15,96 s |
| 1,000 m standing start | 25,87 s | 28,99 s |
| Top speed limited | 250 km/h | 232 km/h |
Manufacturer technical specifications. The power-to-weight ratio is the key physical factor in a drag race.
| Characteristic | Value | Detail |
|---|---|---|
| Power | 265 hp | 4 cyl |
| Torque | 400 Nm | |
| Weight | 1 445 kg | manufacturer kerb weight |
| Drivetrain | 128ti | |
| Gearbox | Eight-speed Steptronic Sport transmission |
| Characteristic | Value | Detail |
|---|---|---|
| Power | 150 hp | Pending |
| Torque | 360 Nm | |
| Weight | 1 410 kg | manufacturer kerb weight |
| Drivetrain | Traction | |
| Gearbox | 7-speed S tronic |
Off the line, the Bmw 128ti hits 100 km/h in 6.27 s versus 8.19 s for the A3 Sportback. At this point, the Bmw 128ti leads by 1.92 s and sits roughly 7 m ahead.
At 200 metres, the Bmw 128ti is doing 132 km/h against 115 km/h for the A3 Sportback. The gap is 0.80 s. The challenger starts to claw back ground.
At 400 metres standing start, the Bmw 128ti crosses the line in 14.44 s versus 15.95 s. The 1.51 s gap represents roughly 59 m of track — a gap visible to the naked eye.
Past 400 metres, the Bmw 128ti continues to build its lead. At 600 metres, it runs at 184 km/h versus 161 km/h. At 1,000 metres, the Bmw 128ti finishes in 25.86 s versus 28.98 s, with a 3.12 s lead.
Electronically capped at 250 (i.e. 155 mph — industry threshold) km/h, the Bmw 128ti never reaches its natural aerodynamic ceiling in this duel. That’s not a physical limit of the motor — it’s a deliberate manufacturer decision, typically tied to standard-fit tyre ratings or model-range positioning.
With two combustion powertrains, the difference comes down to power-to-weight ratio (5.45 kg/hp vs 9.40 kg/hp) and transmission (Automatic vs Automatic).
In European road use (130 km/h max), both vehicles reach the legal speed limit in under 13.06 seconds. The 1.92 s difference in 0 to 100 km/h is mostly felt in motorway merging and overtaking.
Swap one of the two models to explore an equivalent duel in the same segment.
Sur 0–100 km/h, 128ti F40 gagne (6,27 s vs 8,19 s).
128ti F40 passe de 0 à 100 km/h en 6,27 secondes (simulation calibrée).
128ti F40 : 265 hp, ratio 5,45 kg/hp. A3 Sportback : 150 hp, ratio 9,40 kg/hp.
128ti F40 : 250 km/h. A3 Sportback : 232 km/h.