Bmw 320d G20 vs Renault Kadjar 1.3 TCe 160 EDC : which one is faster?
0-100 km/h, 400 m, 1000 m, top speed — physics simulation calibrated on 7 measures.
Simulation de performance
Race simulation at real speed
0Calibrated physics simulation: SCx via VMax, power curves, Crr via WLTP, drivetrain losses. Manufacturer 0-100 is the calibration target. Confidence 0 %.
Bmw 320d vs Kadjar 1.3 TCe 160 EDC: chronicle of a drag race at 235 km/h
The launch: 0 to 100 km/h
Off the line, the Bmw 320d hits 100 km/h in 6.92 s versus 9.81 s for the Kadjar 1.3 TCe 160 EDC. At this point, the Bmw 320d leads by 2.89 s and sits roughly 46 m ahead.
From 100 km/h to 400 metres
At 200 metres, the Bmw 320d is doing 119 km/h against 113 km/h for the Kadjar 1.3 TCe 160 EDC. The gap is 2.13 s. The challenger starts to claw back ground.
At 400 metres standing start, the Bmw 320d crosses the line in 15.02 s versus 17.37 s. The 2.35 s gap represents roughly 89 m of track — a gap visible to the naked eye.
Beyond 400 metres: top speed comes into play
Past 400 metres, the Bmw 320d continues to build its lead. At 600 metres, it runs at 166 km/h versus 159 km/h. At 1,000 metres, the Bmw 320d finishes in 27.72 s versus 30.61 s, with a 2.89 s lead.
What the numbers don’t tell you
Electronically capped at 235 km/h, the Bmw 320d never reaches its natural aerodynamic ceiling in this duel. That’s not a physical limit of the motor — it’s a deliberate manufacturer decision, typically tied to standard-fit tyre ratings or model-range positioning.
With two combustion powertrains, the difference comes down to power-to-weight ratio (8.11 kg/hp vs 9.03 kg/hp) and transmission (Automatic vs Automatic).
In European road use (130 km/h max), both vehicles reach the legal speed limit in under 14.73 seconds. The 2.89 s difference in 0 to 100 km/h is mostly felt in motorway merging and overtaking.
Bmw 320d has a clear edge over the Renault Kadjar 1.3 TCe 160 EDC to 100 km/h. This difference is clearly noticeable in spirited driving and widens on standing starts.