Sur 0–100 km/h, 330d G20 gagne (5,40 s vs 5,58 s).
Performance comparison
Simulated drag race 0 → 1,000 m in real time. Synchronised speed counters and stopwatch. Physics calibration on 7 manufacturer measurements.
Simulation
Calibration
Physics model calibrated on manufacturer splits. The limited top speed is not the real aerodynamic top speed of the vehicles.
| 740Le iPerformance G11 | 330d G20 | |
|---|---|---|
| 0–100 km/h | 5,58 s | 5,40 s+0,18 s |
| 400 m standing start | 13,77 s | 13,68 s+0,09 s |
| 1,000 m standing start | 25,05 s | 24,90 s+0,15 s |
| Top speed (electronically limited) | 250 km/h | 250 km/h |
| Power-to-weight ratio | 5,95 kg/hpbetter ratio | 6,00 kg/hp |
Standing-start drag race, calibrated on manufacturer splits. The gap shows at each stage.
Simulated performance at each stage. Winner in green.
| Palier | 740Le iPerformance G11 | 330d G20 |
|---|---|---|
| 0–30 km/h | 1,29 s | 1,32 stight gap |
| 0–50 km/h | 2,14 s | 2,17 stight gap |
| 0–80 km/h | 3,85 s | 3,87 stight gap |
| 0–100 km/h | 5,58 s | 5,40 s |
| 0–120 km/h | 7,52 s | 7,32 s |
| 0–160 km/h | 12,85 s | 12,63 s |
| 0–200 km/h | 21,11 s | 20,83 s |
| 400 m standing start | 13,77 s | 13,68 stight gap |
| 1,000 m standing start | 25,05 s | 24,90 s |
| Top speed limited | 250 km/h | 250 km/h |
Manufacturer technical specifications. The power-to-weight ratio is the key physical factor in a drag race.
| Characteristic | Value | Detail |
|---|---|---|
| Power | 326 hp | 4 cyl |
| Torque | 400 Nm | |
| Weight | 1 940 kg | manufacturer kerb weight |
| Drivetrain | — | |
| Gearbox | 8-speed Steptronic |
| Characteristic | Value | Detail |
|---|---|---|
| Power | 265 hp | Pending |
| Torque | 580 Nm | |
| Weight | 1 590 kg | manufacturer kerb weight |
| Drivetrain | — | |
| Gearbox | Eight-speed Steptronic transmission |
Off the line, the Bmw 330d hits 100 km/h in 5.40 s versus 5.58 s for the Bmw 740Le iPerformance. Despite lacking instant torque, 265 hp of power compensates. The 0.18 s gap is negligible: both vehicles are neck and neck.
At 200 metres, the Bmw 330d is doing 134 km/h against 132 km/h for the Bmw 740Le iPerformance. The gap is 0.05 s. The challenger starts to claw back ground.
At 400 metres standing start, the Bmw 330d crosses the line in 13.68 s versus 13.77 s. The 0.09 s gap represents roughly 4 m of track — barely a car length.
Past 400 metres, the Bmw 330d continues to build its lead. At 600 metres, it runs at 187 km/h versus 186 km/h. At 1,000 metres, the Bmw 330d finishes in 24.90 s versus 25.05 s, with a 0.15 s lead. Both vehicles have similar top speeds (250 (i.e. 155 mph — industry threshold) vs 250 (i.e. 155 mph — industry threshold) km/h), preventing any comeback.
Both rivals share the same electronic speed cap: the Bmw 740Le iPerformance and the Bmw 330d are governed to 250 (i.e. 155 mph — industry threshold) km/h. At that speed, standard-fit tyres approach their safety threshold — an industrial ceiling common to most electric vehicles in this segment. Neither car shows its true aerodynamic potential in this duel.
Instant electric torque gives an advantage off the line. The higher top speed of the combustion engine gives an advantage over longer distances. The distance at which one catches the other depends on the top speed differential.
In European road use (130 km/h max), both vehicles reach the legal speed limit in under 8.68 seconds. The 0.18 s difference in 0 to 100 km/h is mostly felt in motorway merging and overtaking.
Swap one of the two models to explore an equivalent duel in the same segment.
Sur 0–100 km/h, 330d G20 gagne (5,40 s vs 5,58 s).
740Le iPerformance G11 passe de 0 à 100 km/h en 5,58 secondes (simulation calibrée).
740Le iPerformance G11 : 326 hp, ratio 5,95 kg/hp. 330d G20 : 265 hp, ratio 6,00 kg/hp.
740Le iPerformance G11 : 250 km/h. 330d G20 : 250 km/h.