Over 0–100 km/h, 330d G20 wins (5,40 s vs 5,65 s).
Performance comparison
Simulated drag race 0 → 1,000 m in real time. Synchronised speed counters and stopwatch. Physics calibration on 7 manufacturer measurements.
Simulation
Calibration
Physics model calibrated on manufacturer splits. The limited top speed is not the real aerodynamic top speed of the vehicles.
| 330d G20 | C 300 d W206 | |
|---|---|---|
| 0–100 km/h | 5,40 s−0,25 s | 5,65 s |
| 400 m standing start | 13,68 s−0,20 s | 13,88 s |
| 1,000 m standing start | 24,90 s−0,37 s | 25,27 s |
| Top speed (electronically limited) | 250 km/h | 250 km/h |
| Power-to-weight ratio | 6,00 kg/hpbetter ratio | 6,28 kg/hp |
Standing-start drag race, calibrated on manufacturer splits. The gap shows at each stage.
Simulated performance at each stage. Winner in green.
| Palier | 330d G20 | C 300 d W206 |
|---|---|---|
| 0–30 km/h | 1,32 s | 1,22 stight gap |
| 0–50 km/h | 2,17 s | 2,12 stight gap |
| 0–80 km/h | 3,87 s | 4,05 s |
| 0–100 km/h | 5,40 s | 5,65 s |
| 0–120 km/h | 7,32 s | 7,73 s |
| 0–160 km/h | 12,63 s | 13,34 s |
| 0–200 km/h | 20,83 s | 21,94 s |
| 400 m standing start | 13,68 s | 13,88 s |
| 1,000 m standing start | 24,90 s | 25,27 s |
| Top speed limited | 250 km/h | 250 km/h |
Manufacturer technical specifications. The power-to-weight ratio is the key physical factor in a drag race.
| Characteristic | Value | Detail |
|---|---|---|
| Power | 265 hp | Pending |
| Torque | 580 Nm | |
| Weight | 1 590 kg | manufacturer kerb weight |
| Drivetrain | - | |
| Gearbox | Eight-speed Steptronic transmission |
| Characteristic | Value | Detail |
|---|---|---|
| Power | 265 hp | Pending |
| Torque | 550 Nm | |
| Weight | 1 665 kg | manufacturer kerb weight |
| Drivetrain | Propulsion | |
| Gearbox | 9G-Tronic |
Off the line, the Bmw 330d hits 100 km/h in 5.40 s versus 5.65 s for the C 300 d. The 0.25 s gap is negligible: both vehicles are neck and neck.
At 200 metres, the Bmw 330d is doing 134 km/h against 131 km/h for the C 300 d. The gap is 0.09 s. The challenger starts to claw back ground.
At 400 metres standing start, the Bmw 330d crosses the line in 13.68 s versus 13.88 s. The 0.20 s gap represents roughly 9 m of track - barely a car length.
Past 400 metres, the Bmw 330d continues to build its lead. At 600 metres, it runs at 187 km/h versus 184 km/h. At 1,000 metres, the Bmw 330d finishes in 24.90 s versus 25.26 s, with a 0.37 s lead. Both vehicles have similar top speeds (250 (i.e. 155 mph - industry threshold) vs 250 (i.e. 155 mph - industry threshold) km/h), preventing any comeback.
Both rivals share the same electronic speed cap: the Bmw 330d and the C 300 d are governed to 250 (i.e. 155 mph - industry threshold) km/h. At that speed, standard-fit tyres approach their safety threshold - an industrial ceiling common to most electric vehicles in this segment. Neither car shows its true aerodynamic potential in this duel.
With two combustion powertrains, the difference comes down to power-to-weight ratio (6.00 kg/hp vs 6.28 kg/hp) and transmission (Automatic vs Unknown).
In European road use (130 km/h max), both vehicles reach the legal speed limit in under 8.87 seconds. The 0.25 s difference in 0 to 100 km/h is mostly felt in motorway merging and overtaking.
Swap one of the two models to explore an equivalent duel in the same segment.
Over 0–100 km/h, 330d G20 wins (5,40 s vs 5,65 s).
330d G20 goes from 0 to 100 km/h in 5,40 seconds (calibrated simulation).
330d G20: 265 hp, ratio 6,00 kg/hp. C 300 d W206: 265 hp, ratio 6,28 kg/hp.
330d G20: 250 km/h. C 300 d W206: 250 km/h.