Over 0–100 km/h, 530e iPerformance G30 wins (6,28 s vs 11,26 s).
Performance comparison
Simulated drag race 0 → 1,000 m in real time. Synchronised speed counters and stopwatch. Physics calibration on 7 manufacturer measurements.
Simulation
Calibration
Physics model calibrated on manufacturer splits. The limited top speed is not the real aerodynamic top speed of the vehicles.
| 530e iPerformance G30 | 216d F44 | |
|---|---|---|
| 0–100 km/h | 6,28 s−4,98 s | 11,26 s |
| 400 m standing start | 14,40 s−3,68 s | 18,08 s |
| 1,000 m standing start | 26,31 s−6,44 s | 32,75 s |
| Top speed (electronically limited) | 235 km/h+40 km/h | 195 km/h |
| Power-to-weight ratio | 7,02 kg/hpbetter ratio | 12,28 kg/hp |
Standing-start drag race, calibrated on manufacturer splits. The gap shows at each stage.
Simulated performance at each stage. Winner in green.
| Palier | 530e iPerformance G30 | 216d F44 |
|---|---|---|
| 0–30 km/h | 1,41 s | 2,52 s |
| 0–50 km/h | 2,35 s | 4,24 s |
| 0–80 km/h | 4,29 s | 7,88 s |
| 0–100 km/h | 6,28 s | 11,26 s |
| 0–120 km/h | 8,42 s | 15,81 s |
| 0–160 km/h | 14,95 s | 31,35 s |
| 0–200 km/h | 26,50 s | - |
| 400 m standing start | 14,40 s | 18,08 s |
| 1,000 m standing start | 26,31 s | 32,75 s |
| Top speed | 235 km/h | 195 km/h |
Manufacturer technical specifications. The power-to-weight ratio is the key physical factor in a drag race.
| Characteristic | Value | Detail |
|---|---|---|
| Power | 252 hp | 4 cyl |
| Torque | 290 Nm | |
| Weight | 1 770 kg | manufacturer kerb weight |
| Drivetrain | Propulsion | |
| Gearbox | 8-speed Steptronic |
| Characteristic | Value | Detail |
|---|---|---|
| Power | 116 hp | 3 cyl |
| Torque | 270 Nm | |
| Weight | 1 425 kg | manufacturer kerb weight |
| Drivetrain | - | |
| Gearbox | 6-speed manual |
Off the line, the Bmw 530e iPerformance hits 100 km/h in 6.28 s versus 11.26 s for the Bmw 216d. The instant torque of 290 Nm from the electric motor makes the difference. At this point, the Bmw 530e iPerformance leads by 4.98 s and sits roughly 38 m ahead.
At 200 metres, the Bmw 530e iPerformance is doing 127 km/h against 103 km/h for the Bmw 216d. The gap is 2.52 s. The challenger starts to claw back ground.
At 400 metres standing start, the Bmw 530e iPerformance crosses the line in 14.39 s versus 18.08 s. The 3.68 s gap represents roughly 124 m of track - a gap visible to the naked eye.
Past 400 metres, the Bmw 530e iPerformance continues to build its lead. At 600 metres, it runs at 176 km/h versus 143 km/h. At 1,000 metres, the Bmw 530e iPerformance finishes in 26.31 s versus 32.74 s, with a 6.44 s lead.
Both rivals are electronically governed, but not at the same level: the Bmw 530e iPerformance is capped at 235 km/h, the Bmw 216d at 195 km/h. This isn’t a physical engine limit - it’s a manufacturer choice, usually for tyre safety or homologation reasons. Neither car reaches its true aerodynamic top speed.
Instant electric torque gives an advantage off the line. The higher top speed of the combustion engine gives an advantage over longer distances. The distance at which one catches the other depends on the top speed differential.
In European road use (130 km/h max), both vehicles reach the legal speed limit in under 18.65 seconds. The 4.98 s difference in 0 to 100 km/h is mostly felt in motorway merging and overtaking.
Swap one of the two models to explore an equivalent duel in the same segment.
Over 0–100 km/h, 530e iPerformance G30 wins (6,28 s vs 11,26 s).
530e iPerformance G30 goes from 0 to 100 km/h in 6,28 seconds (calibrated simulation).
530e iPerformance G30: 252 hp, ratio 7,02 kg/hp. 216d F44: 116 hp, ratio 12,28 kg/hp.
530e iPerformance G30: 235 km/h. 216d F44: 195 km/h.