Sur 0–100 km/h, 530d G30 gagne (5,57 s vs 5,58 s).
Performance comparison
Simulated drag race 0 → 1,000 m in real time. Synchronised speed counters and stopwatch. Physics calibration on 7 manufacturer measurements.
Simulation
Calibration
Physics model calibrated on manufacturer splits. The limited top speed is not the real aerodynamic top speed of the vehicles.
| 740Le iPerformance G11 | 530d G30 | |
|---|---|---|
| 0–100 km/h | 5,58 s | 5,57 s+0,01 s |
| 400 m standing start | 13,77 s−0,09 s | 13,86 s |
| 1,000 m standing start | 25,05 s−0,14 s | 25,19 s |
| Top speed (electronically limited) | 250 km/h | 250 km/h |
| Power-to-weight ratio | 5,95 kg/hpbetter ratio | 6,15 kg/hp |
Standing-start drag race, calibrated on manufacturer splits. The gap shows at each stage.
Simulated performance at each stage. Winner in green.
| Palier | 740Le iPerformance G11 | 530d G30 |
|---|---|---|
| 0–30 km/h | 1,29 s | 1,40 stight gap |
| 0–50 km/h | 2,14 s | 2,26 stight gap |
| 0–80 km/h | 3,85 s | 3,97 stight gap |
| 0–100 km/h | 5,58 s | 5,57 stight gap |
| 0–120 km/h | 7,52 s | 7,57 stight gap |
| 0–160 km/h | 12,85 s | 13,08 s |
| 0–200 km/h | 21,11 s | 21,61 s |
| 400 m standing start | 13,77 s | 13,86 stight gap |
| 1,000 m standing start | 25,05 s | 25,19 stight gap |
| Top speed limited | 250 km/h | 250 km/h |
Manufacturer technical specifications. The power-to-weight ratio is the key physical factor in a drag race.
| Characteristic | Value | Detail |
|---|---|---|
| Power | 326 hp | 4 cyl |
| Torque | 400 Nm | |
| Weight | 1 940 kg | manufacturer kerb weight |
| Drivetrain | — | |
| Gearbox | 8-speed Steptronic |
| Characteristic | Value | Detail |
|---|---|---|
| Power | 286 hp | Pending |
| Torque | 650 Nm | |
| Weight | 1 760 kg | manufacturer kerb weight |
| Drivetrain | Propulsion | |
| Gearbox | Eight-speed Steptronic transmission |
Off the line, the Bmw 530d hits 100 km/h in 5.57 s versus 5.58 s for the Bmw 740Le iPerformance. Despite lacking instant torque, 286 hp of power compensates. The 0.01 s gap is negligible: both vehicles are neck and neck.
At 200 metres, the Bmw 740Le iPerformance is doing 132 km/h against 132 km/h for the Bmw 530d. The gap is 0.07 s. The gap widens compared to the 0-100.
At 400 metres standing start, the Bmw 740Le iPerformance crosses the line in 13.77 s versus 13.86 s. The 0.09 s gap represents roughly 4 m of track — barely a car length.
Past 400 metres, nothing changes. Same ceiling, same acceleration, same trajectory — both rivals run in formation to the line. The 0.14 s gap at 1,000 metres confirms what the specs already suggested: on track, they’re interchangeable. The real contest happens elsewhere — range, comfort, charging network reliability.
Both rivals share the same electronic speed cap: the Bmw 740Le iPerformance and the Bmw 530d are governed to 250 (i.e. 155 mph — industry threshold) km/h. At that speed, standard-fit tyres approach their safety threshold — an industrial ceiling common to most electric vehicles in this segment. Neither car shows its true aerodynamic potential in this duel.
Instant electric torque gives an advantage off the line. The higher top speed of the combustion engine gives an advantage over longer distances. The distance at which one catches the other depends on the top speed differential.
In European road use (130 km/h max), both vehicles reach the legal speed limit in under 8.74 seconds. The 0.01 s difference in 0 to 100 km/h is mostly felt in motorway merging and overtaking.
Swap one of the two models to explore an equivalent duel in the same segment.
Sur 0–100 km/h, 530d G30 gagne (5,57 s vs 5,58 s).
740Le iPerformance G11 passe de 0 à 100 km/h en 5,58 secondes (simulation calibrée).
740Le iPerformance G11 : 326 hp, ratio 5,95 kg/hp. 530d G30 : 286 hp, ratio 6,15 kg/hp.
740Le iPerformance G11 : 250 km/h. 530d G30 : 250 km/h.