Sur 0–100 km/h, A110 Pure 252 gagne (4,55 s vs 4,95 s).
Performance comparison
Simulated drag race 0 → 1,000 m in real time. Synchronised speed counters and stopwatch. Physics calibration on 7 manufacturer measurements.
Simulation
Calibration
Physics model calibrated on manufacturer splits. The limited top speed is not the real aerodynamic top speed of the vehicles.
| 840i G15 | A110 Pure 252 | |
|---|---|---|
| 0–100 km/h | 4,95 s | 4,55 s+0,40 s |
| 400 m standing start | 13,16 s | 12,62 s+0,54 s |
| 1,000 m standing start | 23,75 s | 22,69 s+1,06 s |
| Top speed (electronically limited) | 250 km/h | 277 km/h−27 km/h |
| Power-to-weight ratio | 5,03 kg/hp | 4,31 kg/hpbetter ratio |
Standing-start drag race, calibrated on manufacturer splits. The gap shows at each stage.
Simulated performance at each stage. Winner in green.
| Palier | 840i G15 | A110 Pure 252 |
|---|---|---|
| 0–30 km/h | 1,33 s | 1,34 stight gap |
| 0–50 km/h | 2,23 s | 2,24 stight gap |
| 0–80 km/h | 3,66 s | 3,55 stight gap |
| 0–100 km/h | 4,95 s | 4,55 s |
| 0–120 km/h | 6,53 s | 5,87 s |
| 0–160 km/h | 10,83 s | 9,32 s |
| 0–200 km/h | 17,36 s | 14,57 s |
| 400 m standing start | 13,16 s | 12,62 s |
| 1,000 m standing start | 23,75 s | 22,69 s |
| Top speed limited | 250 km/h | 277 km/h |
Manufacturer technical specifications. The power-to-weight ratio is the key physical factor in a drag race.
| Characteristic | Value | Detail |
|---|---|---|
| Power | 340 hp | 6 cyl |
| Torque | 500 Nm | |
| Weight | 1 710 kg | manufacturer kerb weight |
| Drivetrain | — | |
| Gearbox | 8-speed Steptronic |
| Characteristic | Value | Detail |
|---|---|---|
| Power | 256 hp | Pending |
| Torque | 320 Nm | |
| Weight | 1 103 kg | manufacturer kerb weight |
| Drivetrain | — | |
| Gearbox | 7-speed dual-clutch |
Off the line, the A110 Pure 252 hits 100 km/h in 4.56 s versus 4.95 s for the Bmw 840i. At this point, the A110 Pure 252 leads by 0.40 s and sits roughly 1 m ahead.
At 200 metres, the A110 Pure 252 is doing 151 km/h against 142 km/h for the Bmw 840i. The gap is 0.27 s. The challenger starts to claw back ground.
At 400 metres standing start, the A110 Pure 252 crosses the line in 12.61 s versus 13.15 s. The 0.54 s gap represents roughly 26 m of track — two to three car lengths.
Past 400 metres, the A110 Pure 252 continues to build its lead. At 600 metres, it runs at 209 km/h versus 198 km/h. At 1,000 metres, the A110 Pure 252 finishes in 22.69 s versus 23.75 s, with a 1.06 s lead.
Electronically capped at 250 (i.e. 155 mph — industry threshold) km/h, the Bmw 840i never reaches its natural aerodynamic ceiling in this duel. That’s not a physical limit of the motor — it’s a deliberate manufacturer decision, typically tied to standard-fit tyre ratings or model-range positioning.
With two combustion powertrains, the difference comes down to power-to-weight ratio (5.03 kg/hp vs 4.31 kg/hp) and transmission (Automatic vs Automatic).
In European road use (130 km/h max), both vehicles reach the legal speed limit in under 7.46 seconds. The 0.40 s difference in 0 to 100 km/h is mostly felt in motorway merging and overtaking.
Swap one of the two models to explore an equivalent duel in the same segment.
Sur 0–100 km/h, A110 Pure 252 gagne (4,55 s vs 4,95 s).
840i G15 passe de 0 à 100 km/h en 4,95 secondes (simulation calibrée).
840i G15 : 340 hp, ratio 5,03 kg/hp. A110 Pure 252 : 256 hp, ratio 4,31 kg/hp.
840i G15 : 250 km/h. A110 Pure 252 : 277 km/h.