Sur 0–100 km/h, iX M60 I20 gagne (3,71 s vs 7,41 s).
Performance comparison
Simulated drag race 0 → 1,000 m in real time. Synchronised speed counters and stopwatch. Physics calibration on 7 manufacturer measurements.
Simulation
Calibration
Physics model calibrated on manufacturer splits. The limited top speed is not the real aerodynamic top speed of the vehicles.
| iX M60 I20 | Atto 3 Extended Range | |
|---|---|---|
| 0–100 km/h | 3,71 s−3,70 s | 7,41 s |
| 400 m standing start | 11,94 s−3,63 s | 15,57 s |
| 1,000 m standing start | 21,85 s−7,35 s | 29,20 s |
| Top speed (electronically limited) | 250 km/h+90 km/h | 160 km/h |
| Power-to-weight ratio | 4,26 kg/hpbetter ratio | 8,58 kg/hp |
Standing-start drag race, calibrated on manufacturer splits. The gap shows at each stage.
Simulated performance at each stage. Winner in green.
| Palier | iX M60 I20 | Atto 3 Extended Range |
|---|---|---|
| 0–30 km/h | 0,93 s | 1,96 s |
| 0–50 km/h | 1,54 s | 3,27 s |
| 0–80 km/h | 2,67 s | 5,43 s |
| 0–100 km/h | 3,71 s | 7,41 s |
| 0–120 km/h | 5,03 s | 10,03 s |
| 0–160 km/h | 8,60 s | 19,03 s |
| 0–200 km/h | 13,69 s | — |
| 400 m standing start | 11,94 s | 15,57 s |
| 1,000 m standing start | 21,85 s | 29,20 s |
| Top speed limited | 250 km/h | 160 km/h |
Manufacturer technical specifications. The power-to-weight ratio is the key physical factor in a drag race.
| Characteristic | Value | Detail |
|---|---|---|
| Power | 619 hp | Pending |
| Torque | 1100 Nm | |
| Weight | 2 640 kg | manufacturer kerb weight |
| Drivetrain | Integrale (AWD) | |
| Gearbox | Single-speed reduction gear |
| Characteristic | Value | Detail |
|---|---|---|
| Power | 204 hp | Pending |
| Torque | 310 Nm | |
| Weight | 1 750 kg | manufacturer kerb weight |
| Drivetrain | — | |
| Gearbox | single-speed reduction |
Off the line, the iX M60 hits 100 km/h in 3.72 s versus 7.41 s for the Atto 3 Extended Range. At this point, the iX M60 leads by 3.70 s and sits roughly 28 m ahead.
At 200 metres, the iX M60 is doing 151 km/h against 121 km/h for the Atto 3 Extended Range. The gap is 2.54 s. The challenger starts to claw back ground.
At 400 metres standing start, the iX M60 crosses the line in 11.94 s versus 15.57 s. The 3.63 s gap represents roughly 141 m of track — a gap visible to the naked eye.
Past 400 metres, the iX M60 continues to build its lead. At 600 metres, it runs at 212 km/h versus 160 km/h. At 1,000 metres, the iX M60 finishes in 21.84 s versus 29.19 s, with a 7.35 s lead.
Both rivals are electronically governed, but not at the same level: the iX M60 is capped at 250 (i.e. 155 mph — industry threshold) km/h, the Atto 3 Extended Range at 160 km/h. This isn’t a physical engine limit — it’s a manufacturer choice, usually for tyre safety or homologation reasons. Neither car reaches its true aerodynamic top speed.
With two electric powertrains, the difference comes down to power-to-weight ratio (4.26 kg/hp vs 8.58 kg/hp) and transmission (Automatic vs Automatic).
In European road use (130 km/h max), both vehicles reach the legal speed limit in under 11.71 seconds. The 3.70 s difference in 0 to 100 km/h is mostly felt in motorway merging and overtaking.
Swap one of the two models to explore an equivalent duel in the same segment.
Sur 0–100 km/h, iX M60 I20 gagne (3,71 s vs 7,41 s).
iX M60 I20 passe de 0 à 100 km/h en 3,71 secondes (simulation calibrée).
iX M60 I20 : 619 hp, ratio 4,26 kg/hp. Atto 3 Extended Range : 204 hp, ratio 8,58 kg/hp.
iX M60 I20 : 250 km/h. Atto 3 Extended Range : 160 km/h.