Sur 0–100 km/h, M135i xDrive F40 gagne (4,78 s vs 5,68 s).
Performance comparison
Simulated drag race 0 → 1,000 m in real time. Synchronised speed counters and stopwatch. Physics calibration on 7 manufacturer measurements.
Simulation
Calibration
Physics model calibrated on manufacturer splits. The limited top speed is not the real aerodynamic top speed of the vehicles.
| M135i xDrive F40 | Focus ST 280 | |
|---|---|---|
| 0–100 km/h | 4,78 s−0,90 s | 5,68 s |
| 400 m standing start | 13,00 s−0,80 s | 13,80 s |
| 1,000 m standing start | 23,59 s−1,05 s | 24,64 s |
| Top speed (electronically limited) | 250 km/h | 264 km/h−14 km/h |
| Power-to-weight ratio | 4,98 kg/hpbetter ratio | 5,11 kg/hp |
Standing-start drag race, calibrated on manufacturer splits. The gap shows at each stage.
Simulated performance at each stage. Winner in green.
| Palier | M135i xDrive F40 | Focus ST 280 |
|---|---|---|
| 0–30 km/h | 1,33 s | 1,66 s |
| 0–50 km/h | 2,22 s | 2,77 s |
| 0–80 km/h | 3,58 s | 4,37 s |
| 0–100 km/h | 4,78 s | 5,68 s |
| 0–120 km/h | 6,30 s | 7,28 s |
| 0–160 km/h | 10,46 s | 11,78 s |
| 0–200 km/h | 17,07 s | 19,05 s |
| 400 m standing start | 13,00 s | 13,80 s |
| 1,000 m standing start | 23,59 s | 24,64 s |
| Top speed limited | 250 km/h | 264 km/h |
Manufacturer technical specifications. The power-to-weight ratio is the key physical factor in a drag race.
| Characteristic | Value | Detail |
|---|---|---|
| Power | 306 hp | Pending |
| Torque | 450 Nm | |
| Weight | 1 525 kg | manufacturer kerb weight |
| Drivetrain | Integrale (AWD) | |
| Gearbox | Eight-speed Steptronic Sport transmission |
| Characteristic | Value | Detail |
|---|---|---|
| Power | 280 hp | Pending |
| Torque | 420 Nm | |
| Weight | 1 431 kg | manufacturer kerb weight |
| Drivetrain | Focus ST 280 | |
| Gearbox | 7-speed dual-clutch |
Off the line, the Bmw M135i xDrive hits 100 km/h in 4.78 s versus 5.68 s for the Focus ST 280. At this point, the Bmw M135i xDrive leads by 0.90 s and sits roughly 13 m ahead.
At 200 metres, the Bmw M135i xDrive is doing 144 km/h against 139 km/h for the Focus ST 280. The gap is 0.67 s. The challenger starts to claw back ground.
At 400 metres standing start, the Bmw M135i xDrive crosses the line in 13.00 s versus 13.79 s. The 0.79 s gap represents roughly 38 m of track — a gap visible to the naked eye.
Past 400 metres, the Bmw M135i xDrive continues to build its lead. At 600 metres, it runs at 199 km/h versus 194 km/h. At 1,000 metres, the Bmw M135i xDrive finishes in 23.59 s versus 24.63 s, with a 1.05 s lead. Both vehicles have similar top speeds (250 (i.e. 155 mph — industry threshold) vs 264 km/h), preventing any comeback.
Electronically capped at 250 (i.e. 155 mph — industry threshold) km/h, the Bmw M135i xDrive never reaches its natural aerodynamic ceiling in this duel. That’s not a physical limit of the motor — it’s a deliberate manufacturer decision, typically tied to standard-fit tyre ratings or model-range positioning.
With two combustion powertrains, the difference comes down to power-to-weight ratio (4.98 kg/hp vs 5.11 kg/hp) and transmission (Automatic vs Automatic).
In European road use (130 km/h max), both vehicles reach the legal speed limit in under 8.27 seconds. The 0.90 s difference in 0 to 100 km/h is mostly felt in motorway merging and overtaking.
Swap one of the two models to explore an equivalent duel in the same segment.
Sur 0–100 km/h, M135i xDrive F40 gagne (4,78 s vs 5,68 s).
M135i xDrive F40 passe de 0 à 100 km/h en 4,78 secondes (simulation calibrée).
M135i xDrive F40 : 306 hp, ratio 4,98 kg/hp. Focus ST 280 : 280 hp, ratio 5,11 kg/hp.
M135i xDrive F40 : 250 km/h. Focus ST 280 : 264 km/h.