Sur 0–100 km/h, M240i F44 gagne (4,67 s vs 8,08 s).
Performance comparison
Simulated drag race 0 → 1,000 m in real time. Synchronised speed counters and stopwatch. Physics calibration on 7 manufacturer measurements.
Simulation
Calibration
Physics model calibrated on manufacturer splits. The limited top speed is not the real aerodynamic top speed of the vehicles.
| M240i F44 | A 200 W177 | |
|---|---|---|
| 0–100 km/h | 4,67 s−3,42 s | 8,08 s |
| 400 m standing start | 12,78 s−3,28 s | 16,06 s |
| 1,000 m standing start | 23,03 s−5,40 s | 28,43 s |
| Top speed (electronically limited) | 250 km/h+25 km/h | 225 km/h |
| Power-to-weight ratio | 4,49 kg/hpbetter ratio | 8,44 kg/hp |
Standing-start drag race, calibrated on manufacturer splits. The gap shows at each stage.
Simulated performance at each stage. Winner in green.
| Palier | M240i F44 | A 200 W177 |
|---|---|---|
| 0–30 km/h | 1,33 s | 2,58 s |
| 0–50 km/h | 2,21 s | 3,88 s |
| 0–80 km/h | 3,53 s | 5,99 s |
| 0–100 km/h | 4,67 s | 8,08 s |
| 0–120 km/h | 6,03 s | 10,60 s |
| 0–160 km/h | 9,80 s | 18,03 s |
| 0–200 km/h | 15,52 s | 31,47 s |
| 400 m standing start | 12,78 s | 16,06 s |
| 1,000 m standing start | 23,03 s | 28,43 s |
| Top speed limited | 250 km/h | 225 km/h |
Manufacturer technical specifications. The power-to-weight ratio is the key physical factor in a drag race.
| Characteristic | Value | Detail |
|---|---|---|
| Power | 340 hp | 6 cyl |
| Torque | 500 Nm | |
| Weight | 1 525 kg | manufacturer kerb weight |
| Drivetrain | Propulsion | |
| Gearbox | 8-speed Steptronic Sport transmission |
| Characteristic | Value | Detail |
|---|---|---|
| Power | 163 hp | Pending |
| Torque | 250 Nm | |
| Weight | 1 375 kg | manufacturer kerb weight |
| Drivetrain | Traction | |
| Gearbox | 7G-DCT dual-clutch |
Off the line, the Bmw M240i hits 100 km/h in 4.67 s versus 8.08 s for the A 200. At this point, the Bmw M240i leads by 3.42 s and sits roughly 31 m ahead.
At 200 metres, the Bmw M240i is doing 147 km/h against 121 km/h for the A 200. The gap is 2.35 s. The challenger starts to claw back ground.
At 400 metres standing start, the Bmw M240i crosses the line in 12.78 s versus 16.05 s. The 3.28 s gap represents roughly 130 m of track — a gap visible to the naked eye.
Past 400 metres, the Bmw M240i continues to build its lead. At 600 metres, it runs at 205 km/h versus 170 km/h. At 1,000 metres, the Bmw M240i finishes in 23.03 s versus 28.42 s, with a 5.39 s lead.
Both rivals are electronically governed, but not at the same level: the Bmw M240i is capped at 250 (i.e. 155 mph — industry threshold) km/h, the A 200 at 225 km/h. This isn’t a physical engine limit — it’s a manufacturer choice, usually for tyre safety or homologation reasons. Neither car reaches its true aerodynamic top speed.
With two combustion powertrains, the difference comes down to power-to-weight ratio (4.49 kg/hp vs 8.44 kg/hp) and transmission (Automatic vs Automatic).
In European road use (130 km/h max), both vehicles reach the legal speed limit in under 12.11 seconds. The 3.42 s difference in 0 to 100 km/h is mostly felt in motorway merging and overtaking.
Swap one of the two models to explore an equivalent duel in the same segment.
Sur 0–100 km/h, M240i F44 gagne (4,67 s vs 8,08 s).
M240i F44 passe de 0 à 100 km/h en 4,67 secondes (simulation calibrée).
M240i F44 : 340 hp, ratio 4,49 kg/hp. A 200 W177 : 163 hp, ratio 8,44 kg/hp.
M240i F44 : 250 km/h. A 200 W177 : 225 km/h.