Over 0–100 km/h, M5 F90 wins (3,42 s vs 6,21 s).
Performance comparison
Simulated drag race 0 → 1,000 m in real time. Synchronised speed counters and stopwatch. Physics calibration on 7 manufacturer measurements.
Simulation
Calibration
Physics model calibrated on manufacturer splits. The limited top speed is not the real aerodynamic top speed of the vehicles.
| M5 F90 | John Cooper Works FWD | |
|---|---|---|
| 0–100 km/h | 3,42 s−2,79 s | 6,21 s |
| 400 m standing start | 11,25 s−3,01 s | 14,26 s |
| 1,000 m standing start | 20,43 s−4,87 s | 25,30 s |
| Top speed (electronically limited) | 250 km/h | 251 km/h−1 km/h |
| Power-to-weight ratio | 3,16 kg/hpbetter ratio | 5,09 kg/hp |
Standing-start drag race, calibrated on manufacturer splits. The gap shows at each stage.
Simulated performance at each stage. Winner in green.
| Palier | M5 F90 | John Cooper Works FWD |
|---|---|---|
| 0–30 km/h | 0,97 s | 1,85 s |
| 0–50 km/h | 1,62 s | 3,09 s |
| 0–80 km/h | 2,56 s | 4,95 s |
| 0–100 km/h | 3,42 s | 6,21 s |
| 0–120 km/h | 4,38 s | 7,93 s |
| 0–160 km/h | 7,00 s | 12,59 s |
| 0–200 km/h | 10,73 s | 20,51 s |
| 400 m standing start | 11,25 s | 14,26 s |
| 1,000 m standing start | 20,43 s | 25,30 s |
| Top speed limited | 250 km/h | 251 km/h |
Manufacturer technical specifications. The power-to-weight ratio is the key physical factor in a drag race.
| Characteristic | Value | Detail |
|---|---|---|
| Power | 600 hp | Pending |
| Torque | 750 Nm | |
| Weight | 1 895 kg | manufacturer kerb weight |
| Drivetrain | Integrale (AWD) | |
| Gearbox | Eight-speed M Steptronic transmission with Drivelogic, transmission oil cooling |
| Characteristic | Value | Detail |
|---|---|---|
| Power | 231 hp | Pending |
| Torque | 320 Nm | |
| Weight | 1 175 kg | manufacturer kerb weight |
| Drivetrain | Traction | |
| Gearbox | 8-speed automatic |
Off the line, the Bmw M5 hits 100 km/h in 3.43 s versus 6.21 s for the John Cooper Works FWD. At this point, the Bmw M5 leads by 2.79 s and sits roughly 24 m ahead.
At 200 metres, the Bmw M5 is doing 165 km/h against 137 km/h for the John Cooper Works FWD. The gap is 2.22 s. The challenger starts to claw back ground.
At 400 metres standing start, the Bmw M5 crosses the line in 11.25 s versus 14.26 s. The 3.01 s gap represents roughly 135 m of track - a gap visible to the naked eye.
Past 400 metres, the Bmw M5 continues to build its lead. At 600 metres, it runs at 231 km/h versus 191 km/h. At 1,000 metres, the Bmw M5 finishes in 20.43 s versus 25.29 s, with a 4.87 s lead. Both vehicles have similar top speeds (250 (i.e. 155 mph - industry threshold) vs 251 (i.e. 155 mph - industry threshold) km/h), preventing any comeback.
The Bmw M5 features all-wheel drive (AWD) against the John Cooper Works FWD’s FWD. At low speeds (0-30, 0-50, 0-80 km/h), AWD doubles the driven contact area: all four wheels transmit torque to the road, virtually eliminating wheelspin at launch. This traction advantage is decisive in the range where the motor delivers peak torque, before power and aerodynamics take over.
Electronically capped at 250 (i.e. 155 mph - industry threshold) km/h, the Bmw M5 never reaches its natural aerodynamic ceiling in this duel. That’s not a physical limit of the motor - it’s a deliberate manufacturer decision, typically tied to standard-fit tyre ratings or model-range positioning.
With two combustion powertrains, the difference comes down to power-to-weight ratio (3.16 kg/hp vs 5.09 kg/hp) and transmission (Automatic vs Automatic).
In European road use (130 km/h max), both vehicles reach the legal speed limit in under 8.88 seconds. The 2.79 s difference in 0 to 100 km/h is mostly felt in motorway merging and overtaking.
Over 0–100 km/h, M5 F90 wins (3,42 s vs 6,21 s).
M5 F90 goes from 0 to 100 km/h in 3,42 seconds (calibrated simulation).
M5 F90: 600 hp, ratio 3,16 kg/hp. John Cooper Works FWD: 231 hp, ratio 5,09 kg/hp.
M5 F90: 250 km/h. John Cooper Works FWD: 251 km/h.