Sur 0–100 km/h, Macan 95B.2 gagne (6,29 s vs 7,22 s).
Performance comparison
Simulated drag race 0 → 1,000 m in real time. Synchronised speed counters and stopwatch. Physics calibration on 7 manufacturer measurements.
Simulation
Calibration
Physics model calibrated on manufacturer splits. The limited top speed is not the real aerodynamic top speed of the vehicles.
| Macan 95B.2 | X1 xDrive20i F48 | |
|---|---|---|
| 0–100 km/h | 6,29 s−0,93 s | 7,22 s |
| 400 m standing start | 14,56 s−0,68 s | 15,24 s |
| 1,000 m standing start | 26,84 s−1,21 s | 28,05 s |
| Top speed (electronically limited) | 229 km/h+6 km/h | 223 km/h |
| Power-to-weight ratio | 7,59 kg/hpbetter ratio | 8,88 kg/hp |
Standing-start drag race, calibrated on manufacturer splits. The gap shows at each stage.
Simulated performance at each stage. Winner in green.
| Palier | Macan 95B.2 | X1 xDrive20i F48 |
|---|---|---|
| 0–30 km/h | 1,40 s | 1,33 stight gap |
| 0–50 km/h | 2,34 s | 2,47 stight gap |
| 0–80 km/h | 4,41 s | 4,99 s |
| 0–100 km/h | 6,29 s | 7,22 s |
| 0–120 km/h | 8,77 s | 10,18 s |
| 0–160 km/h | 15,99 s | 18,68 s |
| 0–200 km/h | 30,23 s | 35,74 s |
| 400 m standing start | 14,56 s | 15,24 s |
| 1,000 m standing start | 26,84 s | 28,05 s |
| Top speed | 229 km/h | 223 km/h |
Manufacturer technical specifications. The power-to-weight ratio is the key physical factor in a drag race.
| Characteristic | Value | Detail |
|---|---|---|
| Power | 245 hp | 4 cyl |
| Torque | 370 Nm | |
| Weight | 1 859 kg | manufacturer kerb weight |
| Drivetrain | Integrale (AWD) | |
| Gearbox | DUAL_CLUTCH |
| Characteristic | Value | Detail |
|---|---|---|
| Power | 178 hp | Pending |
| Torque | 280 Nm | |
| Weight | 1 580 kg | manufacturer kerb weight |
| Drivetrain | Integrale (AWD) | |
| Gearbox | 8-speed Steptronic |
Off the line, the Macan hits 100 km/h in 6.29 s versus 7.22 s for the Bmw X1 xDrive20i. At this point, the Macan leads by 0.93 s and sits roughly 6 m ahead.
At 200 metres, the Macan is doing 125 km/h against 118 km/h for the Bmw X1 xDrive20i. The gap is 0.40 s. The challenger starts to claw back ground.
At 400 metres standing start, the Macan crosses the line in 14.56 s versus 15.24 s. The 0.67 s gap represents roughly 27 m of track — two to three car lengths.
Past 400 metres, the Macan continues to build its lead. At 600 metres, it runs at 171 km/h versus 164 km/h. At 1,000 metres, the Macan finishes in 26.84 s versus 28.05 s, with a 1.21 s lead. Both vehicles have similar top speeds (229 vs 223 km/h), preventing any comeback.
Both rivals are electronically governed, but not at the same level: the Macan is capped at 229 km/h, the Bmw X1 xDrive20i at 223 km/h. This isn’t a physical engine limit — it’s a manufacturer choice, usually for tyre safety or homologation reasons. Neither car reaches its true aerodynamic top speed.
With two combustion powertrains, the difference comes down to power-to-weight ratio (7.59 kg/hp vs 8.88 kg/hp) and transmission (Automatic vs Automatic).
In European road use (130 km/h max), both vehicles reach the legal speed limit in under 11.89 seconds. The 0.93 s difference in 0 to 100 km/h is mostly felt in motorway merging and overtaking.
Swap one of the two models to explore an equivalent duel in the same segment.
Sur 0–100 km/h, Macan 95B.2 gagne (6,29 s vs 7,22 s).
Macan 95B.2 passe de 0 à 100 km/h en 6,29 secondes (simulation calibrée).
Macan 95B.2 : 245 hp, ratio 7,59 kg/hp. X1 xDrive20i F48 : 178 hp, ratio 8,88 kg/hp.
Macan 95B.2 : 229 km/h. X1 xDrive20i F48 : 223 km/h.