Sur 0–100 km/h, X3 M40d G01 gagne (4,87 s vs 8,31 s).
Performance comparison
Simulated drag race 0 → 1,000 m in real time. Synchronised speed counters and stopwatch. Physics calibration on 7 manufacturer measurements.
Simulation
Calibration
Physics model calibrated on manufacturer splits. The limited top speed is not the real aerodynamic top speed of the vehicles.
| X3 M40d G01 | Terramar | |
|---|---|---|
| 0–100 km/h | 4,87 s−3,44 s | 8,31 s |
| 400 m standing start | 13,21 s−3,04 s | 16,25 s |
| 1,000 m standing start | 24,25 s−5,16 s | 29,41 s |
| Top speed (electronically limited) | 250 km/h+36 km/h | 214 km/h |
| Power-to-weight ratio | 5,81 kg/hpbetter ratio | 9,00 kg/hp |
Standing-start drag race, calibrated on manufacturer splits. The gap shows at each stage.
Simulated performance at each stage. Winner in green.
| Palier | X3 M40d G01 | Terramar |
|---|---|---|
| 0–30 km/h | 1,25 s | 2,27 s |
| 0–50 km/h | 2,01 s | 3,44 s |
| 0–80 km/h | 3,49 s | 6,00 s |
| 0–100 km/h | 4,87 s | 8,31 s |
| 0–120 km/h | 6,61 s | 11,46 s |
| 0–160 km/h | 11,49 s | 20,91 s |
| 0–200 km/h | 19,48 s | 45,12 s |
| 400 m standing start | 13,21 s | 16,25 s |
| 1,000 m standing start | 24,25 s | 29,41 s |
| Top speed limited | 250 km/h | 214 km/h |
Manufacturer technical specifications. The power-to-weight ratio is the key physical factor in a drag race.
| Characteristic | Value | Detail |
|---|---|---|
| Power | 326 hp | 6 cyl |
| Torque | 680 Nm | |
| Weight | 1 895 kg | manufacturer kerb weight |
| Drivetrain | Integrale (AWD) | |
| Gearbox | 8-speed Steptronic |
| Characteristic | Value | Detail |
|---|---|---|
| Power | 201 hp | Pending |
| Torque | 300 Nm | |
| Weight | 1 810 kg | manufacturer kerb weight |
| Drivetrain | Traction | |
| Gearbox | 7-speed DSG |
Off the line, the Bmw X3 M40d hits 100 km/h in 4.87 s versus 8.31 s for the Terramar. Despite lacking instant torque, 326 hp of power compensates. At this point, the Bmw X3 M40d leads by 3.44 s and sits roughly 30 m ahead.
At 200 metres, the Bmw X3 M40d is doing 138 km/h against 116 km/h for the Terramar. The gap is 2.15 s. The challenger starts to claw back ground.
At 400 metres standing start, the Bmw X3 M40d crosses the line in 13.21 s versus 16.25 s. The 3.04 s gap represents roughly 115 m of track — a gap visible to the naked eye.
Past 400 metres, the Bmw X3 M40d continues to build its lead. At 600 metres, it runs at 191 km/h versus 160 km/h. At 1,000 metres, the Bmw X3 M40d finishes in 24.24 s versus 29.41 s, with a 5.17 s lead.
The Bmw X3 M40d features all-wheel drive (AWD) against the Terramar’s FWD. At low speeds (0-30, 0-50, 0-80 km/h), AWD doubles the driven contact area: all four wheels transmit torque to the road, virtually eliminating wheelspin at launch. This traction advantage is decisive in the range where the motor delivers peak torque, before power and aerodynamics take over.
Electronically capped at 250 (i.e. 155 mph — industry threshold) km/h, the Bmw X3 M40d never reaches its natural aerodynamic ceiling in this duel. That’s not a physical limit of the motor — it’s a deliberate manufacturer decision, typically tied to standard-fit tyre ratings or model-range positioning.
Instant electric torque gives an advantage off the line. The higher top speed of the combustion engine gives an advantage over longer distances. The distance at which one catches the other depends on the top speed differential.
In European road use (130 km/h max), both vehicles reach the legal speed limit in under 13.30 seconds. The 3.44 s difference in 0 to 100 km/h is mostly felt in motorway merging and overtaking.
Swap one of the two models to explore an equivalent duel in the same segment.
Sur 0–100 km/h, X3 M40d G01 gagne (4,87 s vs 8,31 s).
X3 M40d G01 passe de 0 à 100 km/h en 4,87 secondes (simulation calibrée).
X3 M40d G01 : 326 hp, ratio 5,81 kg/hp. Terramar : 201 hp, ratio 9,00 kg/hp.
X3 M40d G01 : 250 km/h. Terramar : 214 km/h.