Over 0–100 km/h, E-PACE P200 wins (8,35 s vs 11,64 s).
Performance comparison
Simulated drag race 0 → 1,000 m in real time. Synchronised speed counters and stopwatch. Physics calibration on 7 manufacturer measurements.
Simulation
Calibration
Physics model calibrated on manufacturer splits. The limited top speed is not the real aerodynamic top speed of the vehicles.
| E-PACE P200 | 216d Gran Tourer F44 | |
|---|---|---|
| 0–100 km/h | 8,35 s−3,29 s | 11,64 s |
| 400 m standing start | 16,19 s−2,01 s | 18,20 s |
| 1,000 m standing start | 29,41 s−3,78 s | 33,19 s |
| Top speed (electronically limited) | 215 km/h+23 km/h | 192 km/h |
| Power-to-weight ratio | 8,74 kg/hpbetter ratio | 12,80 kg/hp |
Standing-start drag race, calibrated on manufacturer splits. The gap shows at each stage.
Simulated performance at each stage. Winner in green.
| Palier | E-PACE P200 | 216d Gran Tourer F44 |
|---|---|---|
| 0–30 km/h | 1,98 s | 2,36 s |
| 0–50 km/h | 3,33 s | 4,10 s |
| 0–80 km/h | 5,88 s | 7,99 s |
| 0–100 km/h | 8,35 s | 11,64 s |
| 0–120 km/h | 11,44 s | 16,57 s |
| 0–160 km/h | 21,17 s | 34,06 s |
| 0–200 km/h | 45,14 s | - |
| 400 m standing start | 16,19 s | 18,20 s |
| 1,000 m standing start | 29,41 s | 33,19 s |
| Top speed | 215 km/h | 192 km/h |
Manufacturer technical specifications. The power-to-weight ratio is the key physical factor in a drag race.
| Characteristic | Value | Detail |
|---|---|---|
| Power | 200 hp | Pending |
| Torque | 320 Nm | |
| Weight | 1 748 kg | manufacturer kerb weight |
| Drivetrain | - | |
| Gearbox | 9-speed automatic ZF |
| Characteristic | Value | Detail |
|---|---|---|
| Power | 116 hp | 3 cyl |
| Torque | 270 Nm | |
| Weight | 1 485 kg | manufacturer kerb weight |
| Drivetrain | - | |
| Gearbox | 6-speed manual (7-speed Steptronic with double clutch) |
Off the line, the E-PACE P200 hits 100 km/h in 8.35 s versus 11.64 s for the Bmw 216d Gran Tourer. At this point, the E-PACE P200 leads by 3.29 s and sits roughly 22 m ahead.
At 200 metres, the E-PACE P200 is doing 115 km/h against 101 km/h for the Bmw 216d Gran Tourer. The gap is 1.26 s. The challenger starts to claw back ground.
At 400 metres standing start, the E-PACE P200 crosses the line in 16.19 s versus 18.19 s. The 2.01 s gap represents roughly 68 m of track - a gap visible to the naked eye.
Past 400 metres, the E-PACE P200 continues to build its lead. At 600 metres, it runs at 159 km/h versus 140 km/h. At 1,000 metres, the E-PACE P200 finishes in 29.41 s versus 33.18 s, with a 3.77 s lead.
Both rivals are electronically governed, but not at the same level: the E-PACE P200 is capped at 215 km/h, the Bmw 216d Gran Tourer at 192 km/h. This isn’t a physical engine limit - it’s a manufacturer choice, usually for tyre safety or homologation reasons. Neither car reaches its true aerodynamic top speed.
With two combustion powertrains, the difference comes down to power-to-weight ratio (8.74 kg/hp vs 12.80 kg/hp) and transmission (Automatic vs Automatic).
In European road use (130 km/h max), both vehicles reach the legal speed limit in under 19.69 seconds. The 3.29 s difference in 0 to 100 km/h is mostly felt in motorway merging and overtaking.
Swap one of the two models to explore an equivalent duel in the same segment.
Over 0–100 km/h, E-PACE P200 wins (8,35 s vs 11,64 s).
E-PACE P200 goes from 0 to 100 km/h in 8,35 seconds (calibrated simulation).
E-PACE P200: 200 hp, ratio 8,74 kg/hp. 216d Gran Tourer F44: 116 hp, ratio 12,80 kg/hp.
E-PACE P200: 215 km/h. 216d Gran Tourer F44: 192 km/h.