Over 0–100 km/h, 620d Gran Turismo G32 wins (8,08 s vs 8,35 s).
Performance comparison
Simulated drag race 0 → 1,000 m in real time. Synchronised speed counters and stopwatch. Physics calibration on 7 manufacturer measurements.
Simulation
Calibration
Physics model calibrated on manufacturer splits. The limited top speed is not the real aerodynamic top speed of the vehicles.
| E-PACE P200 | 620d Gran Turismo G32 | |
|---|---|---|
| 0–100 km/h | 8,35 s | 8,08 s+0,27 s |
| 400 m standing start | 16,19 s | 15,92 s+0,27 s |
| 1,000 m standing start | 29,41 s | 29,26 s+0,15 s |
| Top speed (electronically limited) | 215 km/h | 220 km/h−5 km/h |
| Power-to-weight ratio | 8,74 kg/hpbetter ratio | 9,29 kg/hp |
Standing-start drag race, calibrated on manufacturer splits. The gap shows at each stage.
Simulated performance at each stage. Winner in green.
| Palier | E-PACE P200 | 620d Gran Turismo G32 |
|---|---|---|
| 0–30 km/h | 1,98 s | 1,67 s |
| 0–50 km/h | 3,33 s | 2,83 s |
| 0–80 km/h | 5,88 s | 5,53 s |
| 0–100 km/h | 8,35 s | 8,08 s |
| 0–120 km/h | 11,44 s | 11,34 stight gap |
| 0–160 km/h | 21,17 s | 21,48 s |
| 0–200 km/h | 45,14 s | 45,26 stight gap |
| 400 m standing start | 16,19 s | 15,92 s |
| 1,000 m standing start | 29,41 s | 29,26 stight gap |
| Top speed | 215 km/h | 220 km/h |
Manufacturer technical specifications. The power-to-weight ratio is the key physical factor in a drag race.
| Characteristic | Value | Detail |
|---|---|---|
| Power | 200 hp | Pending |
| Torque | 320 Nm | |
| Weight | 1 748 kg | manufacturer kerb weight |
| Drivetrain | - | |
| Gearbox | 9-speed automatic ZF |
| Characteristic | Value | Detail |
|---|---|---|
| Power | 190 hp | 4 cyl |
| Torque | 400 Nm | |
| Weight | 1 765 kg | manufacturer kerb weight |
| Drivetrain | - | |
| Gearbox | 8-speed Steptronic |
Off the line, the Bmw 620d Gran Turismo hits 100 km/h in 8.08 s versus 8.35 s for the E-PACE P200. At this point, the Bmw 620d Gran Turismo leads by 0.27 s and sits roughly 9 m ahead.
At 200 metres, the Bmw 620d Gran Turismo is doing 114 km/h against 115 km/h for the E-PACE P200. The gap is 0.32 s. The gap remains stable from the start.
At 400 metres standing start, the Bmw 620d Gran Turismo crosses the line in 15.92 s versus 16.19 s. The 0.27 s gap represents roughly 11 m of track - two to three car lengths.
Past 400 metres, the gap narrows. The E-PACE P200 maxes out at 215 km/h while the Bmw 620d Gran Turismo keeps accelerating towards 220 km/h. At 600 metres, the gap has dropped to 0.22 s.
At 1,000 metres, the Bmw 620d Gran Turismo finishes in 29.25 s versus 29.41 s, with just 0.16 s to spare. The E-PACE P200 fails to fully close the launch gap.
Both rivals are electronically governed, but not at the same level: the E-PACE P200 is capped at 215 km/h, the Bmw 620d Gran Turismo at 220 km/h. This isn’t a physical engine limit - it’s a manufacturer choice, usually for tyre safety or homologation reasons. Neither car reaches its true aerodynamic top speed.
With two combustion powertrains, the difference comes down to power-to-weight ratio (8.74 kg/hp vs 9.29 kg/hp) and transmission (Automatic vs Automatic).
In European road use (130 km/h max), both vehicles reach the legal speed limit in under 13.46 seconds. The 0.27 s difference in 0 to 100 km/h is mostly felt in motorway merging and overtaking.
Over 0–100 km/h, 620d Gran Turismo G32 wins (8,08 s vs 8,35 s).
E-PACE P200 goes from 0 to 100 km/h in 8,35 seconds (calibrated simulation).
E-PACE P200: 200 hp, ratio 8,74 kg/hp. 620d Gran Turismo G32: 190 hp, ratio 9,29 kg/hp.
E-PACE P200: 215 km/h. 620d Gran Turismo G32: 220 km/h.