Performance duelHome › Duel

Lexus IS 300 RWD vs Volkswagen Polo GTI : which one is faster?

0-100 km/h, 400 m, 1000 m, top speed — physics simulation calibrated on 7 measures.

Lexus IS 300 RWD
Volkswagen Polo GTI0-100
211
0 – 100 km/h
7.40s
0.83 s
Polo
6.57s
400 m standing start
15.44s
0.73 s
Polo
14.71s
Top speed
225
26 km/h
Polo
251
Power245 ch
Power207 ch
Torque350 Nm
Torque320 Nm
Weight1 695 kg
Weight1 330 kg
DrivetrainRear-wheel drive (RWD)
DrivetrainFront-wheel drive (FWD)
GearboxAutomatic · 8 sp.
GearboxAutomatic · DSG 7 …
Lexus IS 300 RWD
Lexus
IS 300 RWD
2023
7,40 s
225 km/h
Power245 ch
Torque350 Nm
Weight1 695 kg
DrivetrainRear-wheel drive (RWD)
Faster
Volkswagen Polo GTI
Volkswagen
Polo GTI
2022
6,57 s
251 km/h
Power207 ch
Torque320 Nm
Weight1 330 kg
DrivetrainFront-wheel drive (FWD)
Lexus IS 300 RWD
2023 · PETROL · 245 ch
Volkswagen Polo GTI
2022 · PETROL · 207 ch
0-30 km/h2,08 s
0-50 km/h3,50 s
0-80 km/h5,55 s
0-100 km/h7,40 s
0-120 km/h9,77 s
0-160 km/h16,58 s
0-200 km/h29,90 s
400 m DA15,44 s
1 000 m DA27,59 s
VMax225 km/h
0-30 km/h1,87 s
0-50 km/h3,12 s
0-80 km/h4,96 s
0-100 km/h6,57 s
0-120 km/h8,58 s
0-160 km/h14,33 s
0-200 km/h24,18 s
400 m DA14,71 s
1 000 m DA26,29 s
VMax251 km/h
DQM93%
IS 300 RWD
--
Polo GTI
--

Simulation de performance

Race simulation at real speed

CONFIDENCE 93%
400 m result
14.71s
Volkswagen Polo GTI
Gap
0.73s
Distance
400 m
Dist.
IS 300
Gap
Polo GTI
0 m
0.00 s
0 km/h
0 m
0.00 s
0 km/h
100 m
7.11 s
97 km/h
~10 m
2 long.
6.73 s
102 km/h
200 m
10.33 s
124 km/h
~18 m
4 long.
9.81 s
130 km/h
400 m
15.44 s
155 km/h
~31 m
6½ long.
14.70 s
162 km/h
600 m
19.81 s
173 km/h
~44 m
9½ long.
18.88 s
182 km/h
1,000 m
27.59 s
195 km/h
~70 m
15 long.
26.28 s
206 km/h

Calibrated physics simulation: SCx via VMax, power curves, Crr via WLTP, drivetrain losses. Manufacturer 0-100 is the calibration target. Confidence 93 %.

400 m
RACE MODE

Upcoming offersExclusive

Receive personalized offers

Pour recevoir les meilleures offres près de chez vous



IS 300 RWD vs Polo GTI: chronicle of a drag race at 251 km/h

The launch: 0 to 100 km/h

Off the line, the Polo GTI hits 100 km/h in 6.57 s versus 7.40 s for the IS 300 RWD. At this point, the Polo GTI leads by 0.83 s and sits roughly 10 m ahead.

From 100 km/h to 400 metres

At 200 metres, the Polo GTI is doing 130 km/h against 124 km/h for the IS 300 RWD. The gap is 0.52 s. The challenger starts to claw back ground.

At 400 metres standing start, the Polo GTI crosses the line in 14.70 s versus 15.44 s. The 0.74 s gap represents roughly 31 m of track — a gap visible to the naked eye.

Beyond 400 metres: top speed comes into play

Past 400 metres, the Polo GTI continues to build its lead. At 600 metres, it runs at 182 km/h versus 173 km/h. At 1,000 metres, the Polo GTI finishes in 26.28 s versus 27.59 s, with a 1.31 s lead.

What the numbers don’t tell you

Electronically capped at 225 km/h, the IS 300 RWD never reaches its natural aerodynamic ceiling in this duel. That’s not a physical limit of the motor — it’s a deliberate manufacturer decision, typically tied to standard-fit tyre ratings or model-range positioning.

With two combustion powertrains, the difference comes down to power-to-weight ratio (6.92 kg/hp vs 6.43 kg/hp) and transmission (Automatic vs Automatic).

In European road use (130 km/h max), both vehicles reach the legal speed limit in under 11.11 seconds. The 0.83 s difference in 0 to 100 km/h is mostly felt in motorway merging and overtaking.

Volkswagen Polo GTI has a clear edge over the Lexus IS 300 RWD to 100 km/h. This difference is clearly noticeable in spirited driving and widens on standing starts.

Données de performance issues de simulations physiques calibrées (moteur Apex). Consommation basée sur les données WLTP constructeur. Les performances réelles peuvent varier selon les conditions d'utilisation.

Prix énergie indicatifs : essence 1,85€/L, diesel 1,75€/L, électricité 0,25€/kWh (tarif domestique). Calculs basés sur 20 000 km/an.

Caralogy est un service indépendant de comparaison. Les données affichées sont fournies à titre informatif et ne constituent pas une offre commerciale.