Over 0–100 km/h, XC40 B4 wins (8,23 s vs 8,95 s).
Performance comparison
Simulated drag race 0 → 1,000 m in real time. Synchronised speed counters and stopwatch. Physics calibration on 7 manufacturer measurements.
Simulation
Calibration
Physics model calibrated on manufacturer splits. The limited top speed is not the real aerodynamic top speed of the vehicles.
| XC40 B4 | Q3 Sportback | |
|---|---|---|
| 0–100 km/h | 8,23 s−0,72 s | 8,95 s |
| 400 m standing start | 16,11 s−0,58 s | 16,69 s |
| 1,000 m standing start | 29,39 s−1,32 s | 30,71 s |
| Top speed (electronically limited) | 180 km/h | 207 km/h−27 km/h |
| Power-to-weight ratio | 8,17 kg/hpbetter ratio | 10,40 kg/hp |
Standing-start drag race, calibrated on manufacturer splits. The gap shows at each stage.
Simulated performance at each stage. Winner in green.
| Palier | XC40 B4 | Q3 Sportback |
|---|---|---|
| 0–30 km/h | 1,98 s | 1,85 stight gap |
| 0–50 km/h | 3,12 s | 3,14 stight gap |
| 0–80 km/h | 5,74 s | 6,10 s |
| 0–100 km/h | 8,23 s | 8,95 s |
| 0–120 km/h | 11,35 s | 13,43 s |
| 0–160 km/h | 21,46 s | 25,68 s |
| 0–200 km/h | - | 64,35 s |
| 400 m standing start | 16,11 s | 16,69 s |
| 1,000 m standing start | 29,39 s | 30,71 s |
| Top speed | 180 km/h | 207 km/h |
Manufacturer technical specifications. The power-to-weight ratio is the key physical factor in a drag race.
| Characteristic | Value | Detail |
|---|---|---|
| Power | 197 hp | Pending |
| Torque | 300 Nm | |
| Weight | 1 610 kg | manufacturer kerb weight |
| Drivetrain | Traction | |
| Gearbox | 8-speed Geartronic |
| Characteristic | Value | Detail |
|---|---|---|
| Power | 150 hp | Pending |
| Torque | 250 Nm | |
| Weight | 1 560 kg | manufacturer kerb weight |
| Drivetrain | - | |
| Gearbox | 7-stufige S tronic |
Off the line, the XC40 B4 hits 100 km/h in 8.23 s versus 8.95 s for the Q3 Sportback. At this point, the XC40 B4 leads by 0.72 s and sits roughly 2 m ahead.
At 200 metres, the XC40 B4 is doing 115 km/h against 108 km/h for the Q3 Sportback. The gap is 0.20 s. The challenger starts to claw back ground.
At 400 metres standing start, the XC40 B4 crosses the line in 16.10 s versus 16.68 s. The 0.58 s gap represents roughly 21 m of track - two to three car lengths.
Past 400 metres, the XC40 B4 continues to build its lead. At 600 metres, it runs at 158 km/h versus 150 km/h. At 1,000 metres, the XC40 B4 finishes in 29.39 s versus 30.71 s, with a 1.32 s lead. Despite a higher top speed (207 km/h), the Q3 Sportback never recovers its launch deficit.
Both rivals are electronically governed, but not at the same level: the XC40 B4 is capped at 180 km/h, the Q3 Sportback at 207 km/h. This isn’t a physical engine limit - it’s a manufacturer choice, usually for tyre safety or homologation reasons. Neither car reaches its true aerodynamic top speed.
With two combustion powertrains, the difference comes down to power-to-weight ratio (8.17 kg/hp vs 10.40 kg/hp) and transmission (Automatic vs Unknown).
In European road use (130 km/h max), both vehicles reach the legal speed limit in under 15.86 seconds. The 0.72 s difference in 0 to 100 km/h is mostly felt in motorway merging and overtaking.
Swap one of the two models to explore an equivalent duel in the same segment.
Over 0–100 km/h, XC40 B4 wins (8,23 s vs 8,95 s).
XC40 B4 goes from 0 to 100 km/h in 8,23 seconds (calibrated simulation).
XC40 B4: 197 hp, ratio 8,17 kg/hp. Q3 Sportback: 150 hp, ratio 10,40 kg/hp.
XC40 B4: 180 km/h. Q3 Sportback: 207 km/h.