Sur 0–100 km/h, XC40 B4 gagne (8,23 s vs 8,35 s).
Performance comparison
Simulated drag race 0 → 1,000 m in real time. Synchronised speed counters and stopwatch. Physics calibration on 7 manufacturer measurements.
Simulation
Calibration
Physics model calibrated on manufacturer splits. The limited top speed is not the real aerodynamic top speed of the vehicles.
| XC40 B4 | 218d F22 | |
|---|---|---|
| 0–100 km/h | 8,23 s−0,12 s | 8,35 s |
| 400 m standing start | 16,11 s−0,07 s | 16,18 s |
| 1,000 m standing start | 29,39 s−0,07 s | 29,46 s |
| Top speed (electronically limited) | 180 km/h | 213 km/h−33 km/h |
| Power-to-weight ratio | 8,17 kg/hpbetter ratio | 9,47 kg/hp |
Standing-start drag race, calibrated on manufacturer splits. The gap shows at each stage.
Simulated performance at each stage. Winner in green.
| Palier | XC40 B4 | 218d F22 |
|---|---|---|
| 0–30 km/h | 1,98 s | 1,90 stight gap |
| 0–50 km/h | 3,12 s | 3,16 stight gap |
| 0–80 km/h | 5,74 s | 5,94 s |
| 0–100 km/h | 8,23 s | 8,35 stight gap |
| 0–120 km/h | 11,35 s | 11,66 s |
| 0–160 km/h | 21,46 s | 21,48 stight gap |
| 0–200 km/h | — | 44,86 s |
| 400 m standing start | 16,11 s | 16,18 stight gap |
| 1,000 m standing start | 29,39 s | 29,46 stight gap |
| Top speed | 180 km/h | 213 km/h |
Manufacturer technical specifications. The power-to-weight ratio is the key physical factor in a drag race.
| Characteristic | Value | Detail |
|---|---|---|
| Power | 197 hp | 2 |
| Torque | 300 Nm | |
| Weight | 1 610 kg | manufacturer kerb weight |
| Drivetrain | Traction | |
| Gearbox | — |
| Characteristic | Value | Detail |
|---|---|---|
| Power | 150 hp | 4 cyl |
| Torque | 320 Nm | |
| Weight | 1 420 kg | manufacturer kerb weight |
| Drivetrain | 218d | |
| Gearbox | 6-speed manual (8-speed Steptronic) |
Off the line, the XC40 B4 hits 100 km/h in 8.23 s versus 8.35 s for the Bmw 218d. The 0.12 s gap is negligible: both vehicles are neck and neck.
At 200 metres, the XC40 B4 is doing 115 km/h against 114 km/h for the Bmw 218d. The gap is 0.04 s. The gap remains stable from the start.
At 400 metres standing start, the XC40 B4 crosses the line in 16.10 s versus 16.17 s. The 0.07 s gap represents roughly 3 m of track — barely a car length.
Past 400 metres, the XC40 B4 continues to build its lead. At 600 metres, it runs at 158 km/h versus 158 km/h. At 1,000 metres, the XC40 B4 finishes in 29.39 s versus 29.45 s, with a 0.07 s lead. Despite a higher top speed (213 km/h), the Bmw 218d never recovers its launch deficit.
Both rivals are electronically governed, but not at the same level: the XC40 B4 is capped at 180 km/h, the Bmw 218d at 213 km/h. This isn’t a physical engine limit — it’s a manufacturer choice, usually for tyre safety or homologation reasons. Neither car reaches its true aerodynamic top speed.
With two combustion powertrains, the difference comes down to power-to-weight ratio (8.17 kg/hp vs 9.47 kg/hp) and transmission (auto vs Automatic).
In European road use (130 km/h max), both vehicles reach the legal speed limit in under 13.58 seconds. The 0.12 s difference in 0 to 100 km/h is mostly felt in motorway merging and overtaking.
Swap one of the two models to explore an equivalent duel in the same segment.
Sur 0–100 km/h, XC40 B4 gagne (8,23 s vs 8,35 s).
XC40 B4 passe de 0 à 100 km/h en 8,23 secondes (simulation calibrée).
XC40 B4 : 197 hp, ratio 8,17 kg/hp. 218d F22 : 150 hp, ratio 9,47 kg/hp.
XC40 B4 : 180 km/h. 218d F22 : 213 km/h.