Sur 0–100 km/h, 220d Active Tourer F44 gagne (7,59 s vs 8,23 s).
Performance comparison
Simulated drag race 0 → 1,000 m in real time. Synchronised speed counters and stopwatch. Physics calibration on 7 manufacturer measurements.
Simulation
Calibration
Physics model calibrated on manufacturer splits. The limited top speed is not the real aerodynamic top speed of the vehicles.
| XC40 B4 | 220d Active Tourer F44 | |
|---|---|---|
| 0–100 km/h | 8,23 s | 7,59 s+0,64 s |
| 400 m standing start | 16,11 s | 15,67 s+0,44 s |
| 1,000 m standing start | 29,39 s | 28,32 s+1,07 s |
| Top speed (electronically limited) | 180 km/h | 224 km/h−44 km/h |
| Power-to-weight ratio | 8,17 kg/hp | 7,82 kg/hpbetter ratio |
Standing-start drag race, calibrated on manufacturer splits. The gap shows at each stage.
Simulated performance at each stage. Winner in green.
| Palier | XC40 B4 | 220d Active Tourer F44 |
|---|---|---|
| 0–30 km/h | 1,98 s | 2,12 stight gap |
| 0–50 km/h | 3,12 s | 3,29 s |
| 0–80 km/h | 5,74 s | 5,51 s |
| 0–100 km/h | 8,23 s | 7,59 s |
| 0–120 km/h | 11,35 s | 10,28 s |
| 0–160 km/h | 21,46 s | 18,39 s |
| 0–200 km/h | — | 35,52 s |
| 400 m standing start | 16,11 s | 15,67 s |
| 1,000 m standing start | 29,39 s | 28,32 s |
| Top speed | 180 km/h | 224 km/h |
Manufacturer technical specifications. The power-to-weight ratio is the key physical factor in a drag race.
| Characteristic | Value | Detail |
|---|---|---|
| Power | 197 hp | Pending |
| Torque | 300 Nm | |
| Weight | 1 610 kg | manufacturer kerb weight |
| Drivetrain | Traction | |
| Gearbox | 8-speed Geartronic |
| Characteristic | Value | Detail |
|---|---|---|
| Power | 190 hp | 4 cyl |
| Torque | 400 Nm | |
| Weight | 1 485 kg | manufacturer kerb weight |
| Drivetrain | — | |
| Gearbox | 8-speed Steptronic |
Off the line, the Bmw 220d Active Tourer hits 100 km/h in 7.59 s versus 8.23 s for the XC40 B4. At this point, the Bmw 220d Active Tourer leads by 0.64 s and sits roughly 1 m ahead.
At 200 metres, the Bmw 220d Active Tourer is doing 121 km/h against 115 km/h for the XC40 B4. The gap is 0.17 s. The challenger starts to claw back ground.
At 400 metres standing start, the Bmw 220d Active Tourer crosses the line in 15.67 s versus 16.10 s. The 0.43 s gap represents roughly 17 m of track — two to three car lengths.
Past 400 metres, the Bmw 220d Active Tourer continues to build its lead. At 600 metres, it runs at 166 km/h versus 158 km/h. At 1,000 metres, the Bmw 220d Active Tourer finishes in 28.32 s versus 29.39 s, with a 1.07 s lead.
Both rivals are electronically governed, but not at the same level: the XC40 B4 is capped at 180 km/h, the Bmw 220d Active Tourer at 224 km/h. This isn’t a physical engine limit — it’s a manufacturer choice, usually for tyre safety or homologation reasons. Neither car reaches its true aerodynamic top speed.
With two combustion powertrains, the difference comes down to power-to-weight ratio (8.17 kg/hp vs 7.82 kg/hp) and transmission (Automatic vs Automatic).
In European road use (130 km/h max), both vehicles reach the legal speed limit in under 13.40 seconds. The 0.64 s difference in 0 to 100 km/h is mostly felt in motorway merging and overtaking.
Swap one of the two models to explore an equivalent duel in the same segment.
Sur 0–100 km/h, 220d Active Tourer F44 gagne (7,59 s vs 8,23 s).
XC40 B4 passe de 0 à 100 km/h en 8,23 secondes (simulation calibrée).
XC40 B4 : 197 hp, ratio 8,17 kg/hp. 220d Active Tourer F44 : 190 hp, ratio 7,82 kg/hp.
XC40 B4 : 180 km/h. 220d Active Tourer F44 : 224 km/h.