Sur 0–100 km/h, MONA M03 gagne (7,45 s vs 8,23 s).
Performance comparison
Simulated drag race 0 → 1,000 m in real time. Synchronised speed counters and stopwatch. Physics calibration on 7 manufacturer measurements.
Simulation
Calibration
Physics model calibrated on manufacturer splits. The limited top speed is not the real aerodynamic top speed of the vehicles.
| MONA M03 | XC40 B4 | |
|---|---|---|
| 0–100 km/h | 7,45 s−0,78 s | 8,23 s |
| 400 m standing start | 15,48 s−0,63 s | 16,11 s |
| 1,000 m standing start | 27,51 s−1,88 s | 29,39 s |
| Top speed (electronically limited) | 200 km/h+20 km/h | 180 km/h |
| Power-to-weight ratio | 7,60 kg/hpbetter ratio | 8,17 kg/hp |
Standing-start drag race, calibrated on manufacturer splits. The gap shows at each stage.
Simulated performance at each stage. Winner in green.
| Palier | MONA M03 | XC40 B4 |
|---|---|---|
| 0–30 km/h | 2,16 s | 1,98 s |
| 0–50 km/h | 3,61 s | 3,12 s |
| 0–80 km/h | 5,80 s | 5,74 stight gap |
| 0–100 km/h | 7,45 s | 8,23 s |
| 0–120 km/h | 9,58 s | 11,35 s |
| 0–160 km/h | 16,40 s | 21,46 s |
| 0–200 km/h | 27,72 s | — |
| 400 m standing start | 15,48 s | 16,11 s |
| 1,000 m standing start | 27,51 s | 29,39 s |
| Top speed | 200 km/h | 180 km/h |
Manufacturer technical specifications. The power-to-weight ratio is the key physical factor in a drag race.
| Characteristic | Value | Detail |
|---|---|---|
| Power | 208 hp | Permanent Magnet Synchronous Motor |
| Torque | 240 Nm | |
| Weight | 1 581 kg | manufacturer kerb weight |
| Drivetrain | Propulsion | |
| Gearbox | Single-speed fixed gear |
| Characteristic | Value | Detail |
|---|---|---|
| Power | 197 hp | Pending |
| Torque | 300 Nm | |
| Weight | 1 610 kg | manufacturer kerb weight |
| Drivetrain | Traction | |
| Gearbox | 8-speed Geartronic |
Off the line, the MONA M03 hits 100 km/h in 7.45 s versus 8.23 s for the XC40 B4. The instant torque of 240 Nm from the electric motor makes the difference. Despite the faster sprint time, the XC40 B4 is 4 m further along the track at this moment: stronger low-speed acceleration offsets a slower run beyond 100 km/h.
At 200 metres, the MONA M03 is doing 126 km/h against 115 km/h for the XC40 B4. The gap is 0.13 s. The challenger starts to claw back ground.
At 400 metres standing start, the MONA M03 crosses the line in 15.48 s versus 16.10 s. The 0.62 s gap represents roughly 24 m of track — two to three car lengths.
Past 400 metres, the MONA M03 continues to build its lead. At 600 metres, it runs at 174 km/h versus 158 km/h. At 1,000 metres, the MONA M03 finishes in 27.51 s versus 29.39 s, with a 1.88 s lead.
Both rivals are electronically governed, but not at the same level: the MONA M03 is capped at 200 km/h, the XC40 B4 at 180 km/h. This isn’t a physical engine limit — it’s a manufacturer choice, usually for tyre safety or homologation reasons. Neither car reaches its true aerodynamic top speed.
Instant electric torque gives an advantage off the line. The higher top speed of the combustion engine gives an advantage over longer distances. The distance at which one catches the other depends on the top speed differential.
In European road use (130 km/h max), both vehicles reach the legal speed limit in under 13.40 seconds. The 0.78 s difference in 0 to 100 km/h is mostly felt in motorway merging and overtaking.
Swap one of the two models to explore an equivalent duel in the same segment.
Sur 0–100 km/h, MONA M03 gagne (7,45 s vs 8,23 s).
MONA M03 passe de 0 à 100 km/h en 7,45 secondes (simulation calibrée).
MONA M03 : 208 hp, ratio 7,60 kg/hp. XC40 B4 : 197 hp, ratio 8,17 kg/hp.
MONA M03 : 200 km/h. XC40 B4 : 180 km/h.