Aller au contenu principal
CaralogyCaralogy
HomeBrandsRoad TripBudgetDuelGuides
Caralogy

The car comparison platform. Physics simulation, road trips, real costs.

Navigation
All brandsCar duelRunning costsMotorwayMethodology
Simulators
Motorway simulatorRunning costsPerformance duel
Brands
VolkswagenBMWMercedesToyotaTeslaAudi
FRENDEESIT
© 2026 Caralogy · All rights reserved
  1. Home
  2. /Duel
  3. /Sedans
Atto 3vsQ4 40BEV
  • MotorwayMotorwayRange and charging
  • PerformancePerformance0-100, top speed
  • ConsumptionConsumptionYearly cost
  • Specs

BYD Atto 3 Extended Range vs Audi Q4 40 e-tron 150 kW: which one uses less fuel?

Same car, two powertrains. The simulator below calculates the gap based on your mileage and charging type.

compact SUV · 2022 vs 2021 · 15,000 km/an · Mixed · Home 0.20 €/kWh · Methodology

Result · yearly energy cost

ABYD Atto 3 Extended Range

462 €per year

15,4 kWh/100 km weighted · 3.08 € per 100 km · 2 307 kWh per year

Gap62 €per year in favour of the Q4 40 e-tron 150 kW (−13 %)≈ 31 L petrol 95
BAudi Q4 40 e-tron 150 kW

400 €per year

13,3 kWh/100 km weighted · 2.66 € per 100 km · 1 997 kWh per year

Annual mileage
15,000 km
5,000 km50,000 km
Driving mix
Charging type
prix-carburants.gouv.fr — moyenne nationale du 25/08/2026 ; EDF Tarif Bleu Base au 01/08/2026 ; DC autoroute : moyenne des réseaux sans abonnement
The verdict changes with your usage
ProfileSplitAtto 3Q4 40Gap
City70 % city · 25 % road · 5 % motorway442 €340 €102 € · Q4 40
Mixed30 % city · 50 % road · 20 % motorway462 €400 €62 € · Q4 40
Long-distance10 % city · 40 % road · 50 % motorway480 €473 €Nearly level

Cumulative saving for the Q4 40 e-tron 150 kW

1 year
62 €
3 years
186 €
5 years
310 €
10 years
621 €

Energy only. Excludes purchase, insurance, servicing, depreciation.

What produces these figures

WLTP combined
15.5 kWh/100 km · 12.8 L/100 km
Powertrain
Fully electric · Fully electric
Power
204 ch · 201 ch
Kerb weight
1,750 kg · 2,125 kg

Other similar comparisons

BYDVSAudi

Atto 3 Extended Range vs Q4 Sportback 40 e-tron 150 kW

gap 75 €/year
VolvoVSAudi

EX40 Twin Motor AWD vs Q4 40 e-tron 150 kW

gap 313 €/year
RenaultVSBYD

Scenic E-Tech Electric 220 vs Atto 3 Extended Range

gap 75 €/year
VolvoVSAudi

XC40 Recharge Twin AWD vs Q4 40 e-tron 150 kW

gap 370 €/year

Frequently asked questions

On a 100 km mixed trip, the Audi Q4 40 e-tron 150 kW is about 15% cheaper than the BYD Atto 3 Extended Range with default parameters. This ratio shifts with your actual energy prices - simulate for your profile.

BYD Atto 3 Extended Range offers more range: 420 km vs 370 km for Audi Q4 40 e-tron 150 kW (WLTP/EPA). In real motorway use, expect 10-20% less depending on temperature.

The Audi Q4 40 e-tron 150 kW is cheaper across all distances with default rates. If your energy prices differ significantly, simulate to see the real impact on your budget.

Atto 3
· Q4 40