G20 · GENERATION 2020 · SALOON
BMWICE

320d Touring

190 hp, 7,1 s 0-100 : among the 84 saloons 2018–2022, the 320d Touring ranks 3rd of 84 in Combined consumption, 33th of 74 in Tank range, 53th of 84 in 0–100 km/h. Here is what the Caralogy simulations say.

Energy cost · estimate1,10915,000 km · UK mix · home UK £/kWhCustomise →

Power

190hp

400 Nm

0 → 100 km/h

7.1s

VMax 230 km/h

Cons.

4.3L

/100 km

Tank

40L

Sur cette page

Technical identity card

Full specifications BMW 320d Touring

Manufacturer data and values calibrated by the Caralogy simulation engine.

Powertrain

ArchitectureUnknown · 4 cyl.
Displacement1,995 cm\u00b3
Power190 hp
Couple400 Nm
GearboxTorque Converter 8 rapports Automatic
TransmissionRWD

Consumption

Cons. WLTP4,3 L/100km
Tank40 L

Performance

0 → 100 km/h7,1 s
VMax230 km/h

Dimensions and environment

Length4,709 mm
Wheelbase2,851 mm
Width1,827 mm
Height1,440 mm
Boot500 L
Kerb weight1,630 kg
Cd0.27
CO₂ WLTP112 g/km

Caralogy Methodology

Motorway and performance values calibrated by the Caralogy physics simulation engine (SCx, Crr, real torque curves).

See full methodology →

Manufacturer data · motorway values calibrated by the Caralogy engine

Among the 84 saloons, the 320d Touring ranks (top 3 in segment) in fuel consumption. Caralogy simulates its real-world cost: motorway simulation, consumption simulation and performance simulation.

Caralogy Analysis · tailored to this vehicle

Caralogy Verdict

Suitable for

Good compromise for regular use without available charging infrastructure. 3rd of 84 in Combined consumption (4.3 L/100).

Alternatives to consider

If the priority is Combined consumption, the Bmw 420d (1st with 4.2 L/100) takes the lead. If the priority is Tank range, the Bmw 420d (1st with 1405 km) takes the lead.

Fuel consumption: 4.3 L/100 L/100 (3rd of 84 in Combined consumption)

The 320d Touring consumes 4.3 L/100 on the WLTP combined cycle. The segment reference is the Bmw 420d (4.2 L/100).

Tank range: 930 km (33th of 74 in Tank range)

On a full tank, the 320d Touring covers 930 km on the combined cycle. The segment reference reaches 1405 km.

Segment positioning

Where the 320d Touring stands against saloons

Comparison across 84 saloons marketed between 2018–2022.

Combined consumption

3eout of 84

4.3 L/100
Min12.7 L/100 · Ford Mustang GT S550 450
Max4.2 L/100 · Bmw 420d

Tank range

33eout of 74

930 km
Min480 km · Ford Mustang GT S550 450
Max1 405 km · Bmw 420d

0–100 km/h

53eout of 84

7,1 s
Min8,9 s · Bmw 318d Touring
Max3,5 s · BMW M3 Competition xDrive

Direct rivals (same segment, same energy)

Cross-energy alternatives

Same needs, different powertrain.

Model family

The full BMW 3 Series G20 range

Generation G20 launched in 2019. Available versions sorted by energy.

Other versions of the G20

Compare

Popular duels involving the 320d Touring

Take the next step

Find a 320d Touring or value yours

Caralogy receives no commission on these external links.

Frequently asked questions

BMW 320d Touring: what you need to know

Well-argued answers to the most asked questions about this model, based on Caralogy data and simulations.

Where does the 320d Touring rank in its segment?#

Among the 84 saloons 2018–2022, the 320d Touring ranks 3rd of 84 in Combined consumption (4.3 L/100, behind the Bmw 420d), 33th of 74 in Tank range (930 km, behind the Bmw 420d), 53th of 84 in 0–100 km/h (7.1 s, behind the BMW M3 Competition xDrive).

What is the range of the 320d Touring?#

930 km on a full tank (4.3 L/100 on the combined cycle) — 33th of 74 in autonomie du segment.

How much does the 320d Touring cost to run?#

Running costs depend on your profile (mileage, charging type, city/highway mix). Use the Caralogy consumption simulator for a personalised estimate.

Why not a Bmw 420d instead?#

The Bmw 420d leads in Combined consumption (4.2 L/100 vs 4.3 L/100). The choice depends on your priorities: check the 320d Touring vs Bmw 420d duel for a detailed comparison.

How does Caralogy calculate its figures?#

Caralogy does not reproduce manufacturer figures: we recalculate every number through physics simulation, starting from SCx, mass and the power curve. This is why our figures at 130 km/h differ from WLTP. Full methodology on the dedicated page.