Aller au contenu principal
CaralogyCaralogy
HomeBrandsRoad TripBudgetDuelGuides
Caralogy

The car comparison platform. Physics simulation, road trips, real costs.

Navigation
All brandsCar duelRunning costsMotorwayMethodology
Simulators
Motorway simulatorRunning costsPerformance duel
Brands
VolkswagenBMWMercedesToyotaTeslaAudi
FRDEESIT
© 2026 Caralogy · All rights reserved
Home›Consumption›BMW M440i vs Alpine A290

Consumption comparison

BMW M440i xDrive F32 vs Alpine A290 GTS 192kW: how much do I save per year?

Same car, two powertrains. The simulator below calculates the gap based on your mileage and charging type.

BMWPetrol

M440i xDrive F32

59 L · 2020

7,1 L/100km

VS
AlpineBEVMost economical

A290 GTS 192kW

50 kWh · 2024

15,6 kWh/100km

MotorwayRange & chargingPerformance0-100, top speedConsumptionAnnual TCO

Annual mileage

15 000 km/an

5 000 km50 000 km

Simulated driving mix

Drag anywhere on the bar to adjust

Charging type

Annual energy cost · 15 000 km

Typical annual usage : Mix 30% city / 50% road / 20% motorway · charging home (0,19 €/kWh)

BMWPetrol

M440i xDrive F32

Annual energy cost · 15 000 km

2 224€

14,83 € / 100 km

Equivalent to 1 118 L of petrol 95 per year

Weighted consumption
7,5 L/100km
Fuel price
1,99 €/L
Fuel used
1117,5 L per year
AlpineBEVMost economical

A290 GTS 192kW

Annual energy cost · 15 000 km

441€

2,94 € / 100 km

Equivalent to 222 L of petrol 95 per year

Weighted consumption
15,5 kWh/100km
Energy rate
0,19 €/kWh · home
Energy used
2322,0 kWh per year
Annual gap A290 GTS 192kW vs M440i xDrive+1 783 €/an≈ 896 L petrol 95

Alpine A290 GTS 192kW costs 1 783 €/an less in energy than BMW M440i xDrive F32, over 15 000 kmwith home for this driving mix.

≈ 896 L of petrol 95 saved per year

By charging mix:
  • Home+1 736 €/an
  • AC station+1 527 €/an
  • Fast DC+1 179 €/an

Your savings over the ownership period

Cumulative projection by annual mileage. The cheaper-to-run vehicle widens the gap year after year.

Annual mileage

15 000 km/an

1 year

1 783 €

≈ 896 L petrol 95

3 years

5 348 €

≈ 2687 L petrol 95

5 years

8 913 €

≈ 4479 L petrol 95

10 years

17 826 €

≈ 8958 L petrol 95

Cumulative savings for Alpine A290 GTS 192kW versus BMW M440i xDrive F32. Excluding purchase, insurance, maintenance and depreciation.

Annual cost breakdown by charging mix

Projection over 15 000 km/year, by proportion of each charging type.

BMW

M440i xDrive F32

Fuelkm/year€/kmAnnual cost
Annual fuel1,99 €/L15 000 km0,148 €/km2 224 €
Alpine

A290 GTS 192kW

Charging mixkm/year€/kmAnnual cost
100% Homeoff-peak rate · 0,21 €/kWh15 000 km2 340 kWh0,033 €/km488 €
100% AC stationpublic AC rate · 0,30 €/kWh15 000 km2 340 kWh0,046 €/km697 €
100% Fast DCDC motorway rate · 0,45 €/kWh15 000 km2 340 kWh0,070 €/km1 045 €
Typical mix80% home · 15% AC · 5% DC15 000 km2 340 kWh0,036 €/km547 €
Annual total (typical mix)547 €

Other similar comparisons

BmwVSJaguar

M440i xDrive vs F-TYPE P300

BmwVSJaguar

M440i xDrive vs F-TYPE R P575

AlpineVSBmw

A110 GT 300 vs M440i xDrive

AlpineVSBmw

A290 GTS 192kW vs 220d xDrive Gran Coupe

Frequently asked questions

On a 100 km mixed trip, the Alpine A290 GTS 192kW is about 75% cheaper than the BMW M440i xDrive with default parameters. This ratio shifts with your actual energy prices — simulate for your profile.

The declared range of the Alpine A290 GTS 192kW is 373 km (WLTP/EPA). In real-world conditions, expect 10-20% less.

The Alpine A290 GTS 192kW is cheaper across all distances with default rates. If your energy prices differ significantly, simulate to see the real impact on your budget.