On a 100 km mixed trip, the BMW 320e xDrive Touring is about 45% cheaper than the Audi RS 5 Avant with default parameters. This ratio shifts with your actual energy prices - simulate for your profile.
Consumption comparison
Plug-in hybrid vs electric: the cost depends on your usage profile. Select your scenario below.
1 044 €per year
17,1 kWh/100 km weighted · 6,96 € per 100 km · 1 829 L per year
Cheaper to runAnnual mileage
15 000 km/an
Simulated driving mix
Drag anywhere on the bar to adjust
Charging type
| Profile | Split | RS 5 | 320e | Gap | Advantage |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| City | 70 % city · 25 % road · 5 % motorway | 1 864 € | 1 044 € | 820 € | 320e |
| Mixed | 30 % city · 50 % road · 20 % motorway | 1 864 € | 1 044 € | 820 € | 320e |
| Long-distance | 10 % city · 40 % road · 50 % motorway | 1 864 € | 1 044 € | 820 € | 320e |
On a 100 km mixed trip, the BMW 320e xDrive Touring is about 45% cheaper than the Audi RS 5 Avant with default parameters. This ratio shifts with your actual energy prices - simulate for your profile.
Audi RS 5 Avant offers more range: 75 km vs 46 km for BMW 320e xDrive Touring. In real motorway use, expect 10-20% less depending on temperature.
The BMW 320e xDrive Touring is cheaper across all distances with default rates. If your energy prices differ significantly, simulate to see the real impact on your budget.