On a 100 km mixed trip, the Audi A6 Sportback e-tron is about 35% cheaper than the BMW iX M60 with default parameters. This ratio shifts with your actual energy prices - simulate for your profile.
Consumption comparison
Same car, two powertrains. The simulator below calculates the gap based on your mileage and charging type.
465 €per year
15,5 kWh/100 km weighted · 3,10 € per 100 km · 2 324 kWh per year
Cheaper to runAnnual mileage
15 000 km/an
Simulated driving mix
Drag anywhere on the bar to adjust
Charging type
| Profile | Split | iX | A6 | Gap | Advantage |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| City | 70 % city · 25 % road · 5 % motorway | 619 € | 396 € | 223 € | A6 |
| Mixed | 30 % city · 50 % road · 20 % motorway | 727 € | 465 € | 262 € | A6 |
| Long-distance | 10 % city · 40 % road · 50 % motorway | 860 € | 550 € | 310 € | A6 |
On a 100 km mixed trip, the Audi A6 Sportback e-tron is about 35% cheaper than the BMW iX M60 with default parameters. This ratio shifts with your actual energy prices - simulate for your profile.
Audi A6 Sportback e-tron offers more range: 681 km vs 566 km for BMW iX M60 (WLTP/EPA). In real motorway use, expect 10-20% less depending on temperature.
The Audi A6 Sportback e-tron is cheaper across all distances with default rates. If your energy prices differ significantly, simulate to see the real impact on your budget.