BMWPetrol
M240i F44
Annual energy cost · 15 000 km
2 307€
15,38 € / 100 km
Equivalent to 1 160 L of petrol 95 per year
- Weighted consumption
- 7,7 L/100km
- Fuel price
- 1,99 €/L
- Fuel used
- 1159,5 L per year
Consumption comparison
Same car, two powertrains. The simulator below calculates the gap based on your mileage and charging type.
Annual mileage
15 000 km/an
Simulated driving mix
Drag anywhere on the bar to adjust
Fuel price
Petrol 95 : 1,99 €/L·Diesel : 1,75 €/L
Typical annual usage : Mix 30% city / 50% road / 20% motorway
Annual energy cost · 15 000 km
15,38 € / 100 km
Equivalent to 1 160 L of petrol 95 per year
Annual energy cost · 15 000 km
14,15 € / 100 km
Equivalent to 1 067 L of petrol 95 per year
Skoda Superb 2.0 TSI 220 7DSG costs 185 €/an less in energy than BMW M240i F44, over 15 000 km for this driving mix.
≈ 93 L of petrol 95 saved per year
Cumulative projection by annual mileage. The cheaper-to-run vehicle widens the gap year after year.
1 year
185 €
≈ 93 L petrol 95
3 years
555 €
≈ 279 L petrol 95
5 years
925 €
≈ 465 L petrol 95
10 years
1 851 €
≈ 930 L petrol 95
Cumulative savings for Skoda Superb 2.0 TSI 220 7DSG versus BMW M240i F44. Excluding purchase, insurance, maintenance and depreciation.
Projection over 15 000 km/year.
| Fuel | km/year | €/km | Annual cost |
|---|---|---|---|
| Annual fuel1,99 €/L | 15 000 km | 0,154 €/km | 2 307 € |
| Fuel | km/year | €/km | Annual cost |
|---|---|---|---|
| Annual fuel1,99 €/L | 15 000 km | 0,141 €/km | 2 122 € |
On a 100 km mixed trip, the Skoda Superb 2.0 TSI 220 7DSG is about 10% cheaper than the BMW M240i with default parameters. This ratio shifts with your actual energy prices — simulate for your profile.
The Skoda Superb 2.0 TSI 220 7DSG is cheaper across all distances with default rates. If your energy prices differ significantly, simulate to see the real impact on your budget.