F44 · GENERATION 2020 · COMPACT
BMWICE

M240i

340 hp, 4,6 s 0-100 : among the 25 compacts 2018–2022, the M240i ranks 4th of 25 in 0–100 km/h, 5th of 25 in Top speed, 6th of 25 in Power-to-weight. Here is what the Caralogy simulations say.

Energy cost · estimate2,21215,000 km · UK mix · home 0,21 £/kWhConsumption →

Power

340hp

500 Nm

0 → 100 km/h

4.6s

VMax 250 km/h

Cons.

7.3L

/100 km

Tank

52L

Technical identity card

Full specifications BMW M240i

Manufacturer data. Consumption and range estimated from the WLTP cycle; performance simulated by the Caralogy physics engine.

Powertrain

Displacement2,998 cm³
Power340 hp
Couple500 Nm
GearboxConvertisseur de couple 8 rapports Automatique

Consumption

Cons. WLTP7.3 L/100km
Tank52 L

Performance

0 → 100 km/h4,6 s
VMax250 km/h

Dimensions and environment

Length4,454 mm
Wheelbase2,690 mm
Width1,774 mm
Height1,408 mm
Boot390 L
Kerb weight1,525 kg
Cd0.32
CO₂ WLTP168 g/km

Caralogy Methodology

Performance (0-100, top speed) simulated by the Caralogy physics engine (SCx, Crr, real torque curves). Motorway consumption values estimated from the manufacturer WLTP cycle.

See full methodology →

Manufacturer data · WLTP-estimated consumption · Caralogy-simulated performance

Among the 25 compacts, the M240i ranks (top 4 in segment) in acceleration. Caralogy simulates its real-world performance: motorway simulation, performance simulation and consumption simulation.

Caralogy Analysis

Tailored to this vehicle?

Caralogy Verdict
Suitable for

Demanding drivers: 4th of 25 in 0–100 km/h (4.6 s), 5th of 25 in Top speed (250 km/h), 6th of 25 in Power-to-weight (223 hp/t). 4th of 25 in 0–100 km/h (4.6 s), 5th of 25 in Top speed (250 km/h), 6th of 25 in Power-to-weight (223 hp/t).

Less suitable for

Frequent urban trips with stop-and-go. At 7,3 L/100 km on the combined cycle, consumption rises in the city without electric assistance. An HEV or PHEV would be more economical for this use profile.

Alternatives to consider

If the priority is 0–100 km/h, the Bmw M140i xDrive (1st with 4.4 s) takes the lead. If the priority is Top speed, the Renault Megane 4 RS Trophy 300 (1st with 260 km/h) takes the lead.

Acceleration: 4.6 s 0-100 (4th of 25 in 0–100 km/h)

In pure acceleration, the M240i ranks 4th of 25 in 0–100 km/h, 0.2 s off the reference Bmw M140i xDrive (4.4 s).

Top speed: 250 km/h (5th of 25 in Top speed)

Top speed of 250 km/h. The segment reference reaches 260 km/h.

Segment positioning

Where the M240i stands against compacts

Comparison across 25 compacts marketed between 2018–2022.

0–100 km/h4e / 25
4,6 s
Min 5,6 s · Volkswagen Golf 8 GTI ClubsportMax 4,4 s · Bmw M140i xDrive
Top speed5e / 25
250 km/h
Min 220 km/h · Toyota GR Corolla Circuit EditionMax 260 km/h · Renault Megane 4 RS Trophy 300
Power-to-weight6e / 25
223 hp/t
Min 195 hp/t · Bmw M235i xDriveMax 265 hp/t · Bmw M2 Competition

Direct rivals (same segment, same energy)

Cross-energy alternatives

Same needs, different powertrain.

Model family

The full BMW 2 Series F44 range

Generation F44 launched in 2019. Available versions sorted by energy.

Other versions of the F44

Compare

Popular duels involving the M240i

Frequently asked questions

BMW M240i: what you need to know

Well-argued answers to the most asked questions about this model, based on Caralogy data and simulations.

Among the 25 compacts 2018–2022, the M240i ranks 4th of 25 in 0–100 km/h (4.6 s, behind the Bmw M140i xDrive), 5th of 25 in Top speed (250 km/h, behind the Renault Megane 4 RS Trophy 300), 6th of 25 in Power-to-weight (223 hp/t, behind the Bmw M2 Competition).

Running costs depend on your profile (mileage, charging type, city/highway mix). Use the Caralogy consumption simulator for a personalised estimate.

The Bmw M140i xDrive leads in 0–100 km/h (4.4 s vs 4.6 s). The choice depends on your priorities: check the M240i vs Bmw M140i xDrive duel for a detailed comparison.

Caralogy does not reproduce manufacturer figures: we recalculate every number through physics simulation, starting from SCx, mass and the power curve. This is why our figures at 130 km/h differ from WLTP. Full methodology on the dedicated page.