Aller au contenu principal
CaralogyCaralogy
HomeBrandsRoad TripBudgetDuelGuides
Caralogy

The car comparison platform. Physics simulation, road trips, real costs.

Navigation
All brandsCar duelRunning costsMotorwayMethodology
Simulators
Motorway simulatorRunning costsPerformance duel
Brands
VolkswagenBMWMercedesToyotaTeslaAudi
FRDEESIT
© 2026 Caralogy · All rights reserved
Home›Consumption›BMW X2 vs Renault Scenic

Consumption comparison

BMW X2 M35i F39 vs Renault Scenic E-Tech Electric 220: how much do I save per year?

Same car, two powertrains. The simulator below calculates the gap based on your mileage and charging type.

BMWPetrol

X2 M35i F39

61 L · 2019

7,1 L/100km

VS
RenaultBEVMost economical

Scenic E-Tech Electric 220

87 kWh · 2024

16,6 kWh/100km

MotorwayRange & chargingPerformance0-100, top speedConsumptionAnnual TCO

Annual mileage

15 000 km/an

5 000 km50 000 km

Simulated driving mix

Drag anywhere on the bar to adjust

Charging type

Annual energy cost · 15 000 km

Typical annual usage : Mix 30% city / 50% road / 20% motorway · charging home (0,21 €/kWh)

BMWPetrol

X2 M35i F39

Annual energy cost · 15 000 km

2 203€

14,69 € / 100 km

Equivalent to 1 107 L of petrol 95 per year

Weighted consumption
7,4 L/100km
Fuel price
1,99 €/L
Fuel used
1107,0 L per year
RenaultBEVMost economical

Scenic E-Tech Electric 220

Annual energy cost · 15 000 km

544€

3,63 € / 100 km

Equivalent to 273 L of petrol 95 per year

Weighted consumption
17,3 kWh/100km
Energy rate
0,21 €/kWh · home
Energy used
2589,6 kWh per year
Annual gap Scenic E-Tech Electric 220 vs X2 M35i+1 659 €/an≈ 834 L petrol 95

Renault Scenic E-Tech Electric 220 costs 1 659 €/an less in energy than BMW X2 M35i F39, over 15 000 kmwith home for this driving mix.

≈ 834 L of petrol 95 saved per year

By charging mix:
  • Home+1 659 €/an
  • AC station+1 426 €/an
  • Fast DC+1 038 €/an

Your savings over the ownership period

Cumulative projection by annual mileage. The cheaper-to-run vehicle widens the gap year after year.

Annual mileage

15 000 km/an

1 year

1 659 €

≈ 834 L petrol 95

3 years

4 977 €

≈ 2501 L petrol 95

5 years

8 296 €

≈ 4169 L petrol 95

10 years

16 591 €

≈ 8337 L petrol 95

Cumulative savings for Renault Scenic E-Tech Electric 220 versus BMW X2 M35i F39. Excluding purchase, insurance, maintenance and depreciation.

Annual cost breakdown by charging mix

Projection over 15 000 km/year, by proportion of each charging type.

BMW

X2 M35i F39

Fuelkm/year€/kmAnnual cost
Annual fuel1,99 €/L15 000 km0,147 €/km2 203 €
Renault

Scenic E-Tech Electric 220

Charging mixkm/year€/kmAnnual cost
100% Homeoff-peak rate · 0,21 €/kWh15 000 km2 490 kWh0,036 €/km544 €
100% AC stationpublic AC rate · 0,30 €/kWh15 000 km2 490 kWh0,052 €/km777 €
100% Fast DCDC motorway rate · 0,45 €/kWh15 000 km2 490 kWh0,078 €/km1 165 €
Typical mix80% home · 15% AC · 5% DC15 000 km2 490 kWh0,041 €/km610 €
Annual total (typical mix)610 €

Other similar comparisons

RenaultVSBYD

Scenic E-Tech Electric 220 vs Atto 3 Extended Range

RenaultVSAudi

Scenic E-Tech Electric 220 vs Q4 40 e-tron 150 kW

RenaultVSAudi

Scenic E-Tech Electric 220 vs Q4 Sportback 40 e-tron 150 kW

AudiVSRenault

Q4 45 e-tron 210 kW vs Scenic E-Tech Electric 220

Frequently asked questions

On a 100 km mixed trip, the Renault Scenic E-Tech Electric 220 is about 75% cheaper than the BMW X2 M35i with default parameters. This ratio shifts with your actual energy prices - simulate for your profile.

The declared range of the Renault Scenic E-Tech Electric 220 is 620 km (WLTP/EPA). In real-world conditions, expect 10-20% less.

The Renault Scenic E-Tech Electric 220 is cheaper across all distances with default rates. If your energy prices differ significantly, simulate to see the real impact on your budget.