Annual gap Terramar vs Puma ST 200+998 €/an≈ 502 L petrol 95
Cupra Terramar costs 998 €/an less in energy than Ford Puma ST 200, over 15 000 kmwith home for this driving mix.
≈ 502 L of petrol 95 saved per year
By charging mix:
Home+998 €/an
AC station+998 €/an
Fast DC+998 €/an
Your savings over the ownership period
Cumulative projection by annual mileage. The cheaper-to-run vehicle widens the gap year after year.
Annual mileage
15 000 km/an
1 year
998 €
≈ 502 L petrol 95
3 years
2 995 €
≈ 1505 L petrol 95
5 years
4 991 €
≈ 2508 L petrol 95
10 years
9 982 €
≈ 5016 L petrol 95
Cumulative savings for Cupra Terramar versus Ford Puma ST 200. Excluding purchase, insurance, maintenance and depreciation.
Annual cost breakdown by charging mix
Projection over 15 000 km/year, by proportion of each charging type.
Cupra
Terramar
Charging mix
km/year
€/km
Annual cost
100% Homeoff-peak rate · 0,21 €/kWh
15 000 km3 000 kWh
0,120 €/km
1 797 €
100% AC stationpublic AC rate · 0,30 €/kWh
15 000 km3 000 kWh
0,120 €/km
1 797 €
100% Fast DCDC motorway rate · 0,45 €/kWh
15 000 km3 000 kWh
0,120 €/km
1 797 €
Typical mix80% home · 15% AC · 5% DC
15 000 km3 000 kWh
0,120 €/km
1 797 €
Annual total (typical mix)
1 797 €
Ford
Puma ST 200
Fuel
km/year
€/km
Annual cost
Annual fuel1,99 €/L
15 000 km
0,125 €/km
1 875 €
Frequently asked questions
On a 100 km mixed trip, the Cupra Terramar is about 55% cheaper than the Ford Puma ST 200 with default parameters. This ratio shifts with your actual energy prices — simulate for your profile.
The declared range of the Cupra Terramar is 80 km (WLTP/EPA). In real-world conditions, expect 10-20% less.
The Cupra Terramar is cheaper across all distances with default rates. If your energy prices differ significantly, simulate to see the real impact on your budget.