Aller au contenu principal
CaralogyCaralogy
HomeBrandsRoad TripBudgetDuelGuides
Caralogy

The car comparison platform. Physics simulation, road trips, real costs.

Navigation
All brandsCar duelRunning costsMotorwayMethodology
Simulators
Motorway simulatorRunning costsPerformance duel
Brands
VolkswagenBMWMercedesToyotaTeslaAudi
FRDEESIT
© 2026 Caralogy · All rights reserved
Home›Consumption›Tesla Model 3 vs Alpine A110

Consumption comparison

Tesla Model 3 Long Range AWD vs Alpine A110 S 292: how much do I save per year?

Same car, two powertrains. The simulator below calculates the gap based on your mileage and charging type.

TeslaBEVMost economical

Model 3 Long Range AWD

78 kWh · 2021

14,7 kWh/100km

VS
AlpinePetrol

A110 S 292

45 L · 2019

7,0 L/100km

MotorwayRange & chargingPerformance0-100, top speedConsumptionAnnual TCO

Annual mileage

15 000 km/an

5 000 km50 000 km

Simulated driving mix

Drag anywhere on the bar to adjust

Charging type

Annual energy cost · 15 000 km

Typical annual usage : Mix 30% city / 50% road / 20% motorway · charging home (0,21 €/kWh)

TeslaBEVMost economical

Model 3 Long Range AWD

Annual energy cost · 15 000 km

481€

3,20 € / 100 km

Equivalent to 242 L of petrol 95 per year

Weighted consumption
15,3 kWh/100km
Energy rate
0,21 €/kWh · home
Energy used
2289,2 kWh per year
AlpinePetrol

A110 S 292

Annual energy cost · 15 000 km

2 182€

14,55 € / 100 km

Equivalent to 1 097 L of petrol 95 per year

Weighted consumption
7,3 L/100km
Fuel price
1,99 €/L
Fuel used
1096,5 L per year
Annual gap Model 3 Long Range AWD vs A110 S 292+1 701 €/an≈ 855 L petrol 95

Tesla Model 3 Long Range AWD costs 1 701 €/an less in energy than Alpine A110 S 292, over 15 000 kmwith home for this driving mix.

≈ 855 L of petrol 95 saved per year

By charging mix:
  • Home+1 701 €/an
  • AC station+1 495 €/an
  • Fast DC+1 152 €/an

Your savings over the ownership period

Cumulative projection by annual mileage. The cheaper-to-run vehicle widens the gap year after year.

Annual mileage

15 000 km/an

1 year

1 701 €

≈ 855 L petrol 95

3 years

5 104 €

≈ 2565 L petrol 95

5 years

8 507 €

≈ 4275 L petrol 95

10 years

17 013 €

≈ 8549 L petrol 95

Cumulative savings for Tesla Model 3 Long Range AWD versus Alpine A110 S 292. Excluding purchase, insurance, maintenance and depreciation.

Annual cost breakdown by charging mix

Projection over 15 000 km/year, by proportion of each charging type.

Tesla

Model 3 Long Range AWD

Charging mixkm/year€/kmAnnual cost
100% Homeoff-peak rate · 0,21 €/kWh15 000 km2 205 kWh0,032 €/km481 €
100% AC stationpublic AC rate · 0,30 €/kWh15 000 km2 205 kWh0,046 €/km687 €
100% Fast DCDC motorway rate · 0,45 €/kWh15 000 km2 205 kWh0,069 €/km1 030 €
Typical mix80% home · 15% AC · 5% DC15 000 km2 205 kWh0,036 €/km539 €
Annual total (typical mix)539 €
Alpine

A110 S 292

Fuelkm/year€/kmAnnual cost
Annual fuel1,99 €/L15 000 km0,145 €/km2 182 €

Other similar comparisons

TeslaVSBmw

Model 3 Long Range AWD vs i4 eDrive35

BmwVSTesla

i4 M50 xDrive vs Model 3 Long Range AWD

TeslaVSAudi

Model 3 Long Range AWD vs S4 TDI

AudiVSTesla

A5 Avant e-hybrid quattro 270 kW vs Model 3 Long Range AWD

Frequently asked questions

On a 100 km mixed trip, the Tesla Model 3 Long Range AWD is about 80% cheaper than the Alpine A110 S 292 with default parameters. This ratio shifts with your actual energy prices - simulate for your profile.

The declared range of the Tesla Model 3 Long Range AWD is 629 km (WLTP/EPA). In real-world conditions, expect 10-20% less.

The Tesla Model 3 Long Range AWD is cheaper across all distances with default rates. If your energy prices differ significantly, simulate to see the real impact on your budget.