On a 100 km mixed trip, the Tesla Model X P90D is about 20% cheaper than the Cupra Terramar with default parameters. This ratio shifts with your actual energy prices - simulate for your profile.
Consumption comparison
Plug-in hybrid vs electric: the cost depends on your usage profile. Select your scenario below.
703 €per year
23,4 kWh/100 km weighted · 4,68 € per 100 km · 3 511 kWh per year
Cheaper to runAnnual mileage
15 000 km/an
Simulated driving mix
Drag anywhere on the bar to adjust
Charging type
| Profile | Split | Model | Terramar | Gap | Advantage |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| City | 70 % city · 25 % road · 5 % motorway | 691 € | 862 € | 171 € | Model |
| Mixed | 30 % city · 50 % road · 20 % motorway | 703 € | 862 € | 159 € | Model |
| Long-distance | 10 % city · 40 % road · 50 % motorway | 712 € | 862 € | 150 € | Model |
On a 100 km mixed trip, the Tesla Model X P90D is about 20% cheaper than the Cupra Terramar with default parameters. This ratio shifts with your actual energy prices - simulate for your profile.
Tesla Model X P90D offers more range: 402 km vs 80 km for Cupra Terramar (WLTP/EPA). In real motorway use, expect 10-20% less depending on temperature.
The Tesla Model X P90D is cheaper across all distances with default rates. If your energy prices differ significantly, simulate to see the real impact on your budget.