Skip to main content
CaralogyCaralogy
HomeBrandsRoad TripBudgetDuelGuides
Caralogy

The car comparison platform. Physics simulation, road trips, real costs.

Navigation
All brandsCar duelRunning costsMotorwayMethodology
Simulators
Motorway simulatorRunning costsPerformance duel
Brands
VolkswagenBMWMercedesToyotaTeslaAudi
FRENDEESIT
© 2026 Caralogy · All rights reserved
  1. Home
  2. /Consumption
  3. /SUV
XC40vs216iPetrol
  • MotorwayMotorwayRange and charging
  • PerformancePerformance0-100, top speed
  • ConsumptionConsumptionYearly cost
  • SpecsXC40 · 216i

Volvo XC40 B4 vs BMW 216i Gran Tourer F44: which is cheaper to run?

What each kilometre costs, depending on your driving profile and how you charge. Annual projection and cumulative savings over 10 years.

compact SUV · 2022 vs 2021 · 15,000 km/an · Mixed · Petrol 95 2.17 €/L · Methodology
Annual mileage
15,000 km
5,000 km50,000 km
Driving mix

30 % City · 50 % Road · 20 % Motorway

Fuel price
Petrol 95 2.17 €/L · Diesel 2.38 €/Lprix-carburants.gouv.fr — moyenne nationale du 05/10/2026 ; EDF Tarif Bleu Base au 01/08/2026 ; DC autoroute : moyenne des réseaux sans abonnement

Result · yearly energy cost

AVolvo XC40 B4

2,415 €per year

7,4 L/100 km weighted · 16.10 € per 100 km · 1 113 L per year

Gap416 € per yearin favour of the 216i Gran Tourer (−17 %)≈ 192 L petrol 95
BBMW 216i Gran Tourer F44

1,999 €per year

6,1 L/100 km weighted · 13.32 € per 100 km · 921 L per year

The verdict changes with your usage
ProfileSplitAA · XC40BB · 216iGap
City70 / 25 / 570 % city · 25 % road · 5 % motorway2,698 €2,225 €473 € · 216i
Mixed30 / 50 / 2030 % city · 50 % road · 20 % motorway2,415 €1,999 €416 € · 216i
Long-distance10 / 40 / 5010 % city · 40 % road · 50 % motorway2,195 €1,820 €376 € · 216i

Cumulative saving for the 216i Gran Tourer

1 year
416 €
3 years
1,249 €
5 years
2,082 €
10 years
4,165 €

Energy only. Excludes purchase, insurance, servicing, depreciation.

What produces these figures

WLTP combined
7.1 L/100 km · 5.9 L/100 km
Powertrain
Combustion · Combustion
Power
197 ch · 109 ch
Kerb weight
1,610 kg · 1,425 kg

Other similar comparisons

JaguarVSVolvo

E-PACE P200 vs XC40 B4

gap 272 €/year
CitroenVSBMW

Berlingo PureTech 110 FWD vs 216i Gran Tourer

gap 130 €/year
VolvoVSAudi

XC40 B4 vs Q3 Sportback

gap 358 €/year
MercedesVSBMW

V 300 d 4MATIC vs 216i Gran Tourer

gap 1 281 €/year

Frequently asked questions

On a 100 km mixed trip, the BMW 216i Gran Tourer is about 15% cheaper than the Volvo XC40 B4 with default parameters. This ratio shifts with your actual energy prices - simulate for your profile.

The BMW 216i Gran Tourer is cheaper across all distances with default rates. If your energy prices differ significantly, simulate to see the real impact on your budget.