Aller au contenu principal
CaralogyCaralogy
HomeBrandsRoad TripBudgetDuelGuides
Caralogy

The car comparison platform. Physics simulation, road trips, real costs.

Navigation
All brandsCar duelRunning costsMotorwayMethodology
Simulators
Motorway simulatorRunning costsPerformance duel
Brands
VolkswagenBMWMercedesToyotaTeslaAudi
FRDEESIT
© 2026 Caralogy · All rights reserved
Home›Consumption›Xpeng X9 vs BMW 220d

Consumption comparison

Xpeng X9 vs BMW 220d Active Tourer F44: how much do I save per year?

Same car, two powertrains. The simulator below calculates the gap based on your mileage and charging type.

XpengBEVMost economical

X9

95 kWh · 2024

22,0 kWh/100km

VS
BMWDiesel

220d Active Tourer F44

51 L · 2020

4,3 L/100km

MotorwayRange & chargingPerformance0-100, top speedConsumptionAnnual TCO

Annual mileage

15 000 km/an

5 000 km50 000 km

Simulated driving mix

Drag anywhere on the bar to adjust

Charging type

Annual energy cost · 15 000 km

Typical annual usage : Mix 30% city / 50% road / 20% motorway · charging home (0,19 €/kWh)

XpengBEVMost economical

X9

Annual energy cost · 15 000 km

652€

4,35 € / 100 km

Equivalent to 328 L of petrol 95 per year

Weighted consumption
22,9 kWh/100km
Energy rate
0,19 €/kWh · home
Energy used
3432,0 kWh per year
BMWPetrol

220d Active Tourer F44

Annual energy cost · 15 000 km

1 144€

7,63 € / 100 km

Equivalent to 575 L of petrol 95 per year

Weighted consumption
4,4 L/100km
Fuel price
1,75 €/L
Fuel used
654,0 L per year
Annual gap X9 vs 220d Active Tourer+492 €/an≈ 281 L diesel

Xpeng X9 costs 492 €/an less in energy than BMW 220d Active Tourer F44, over 15 000 kmwith home for this driving mix.

≈ 281 L of diesel saved per year

By charging mix:
  • Home+424 €/an
  • AC station+115 €/an
  • Fast DC+400 €/an

Your savings over the ownership period

Cumulative projection by annual mileage. The cheaper-to-run vehicle widens the gap year after year.

Annual mileage

15 000 km/an

1 year

492 €

≈ 247 L petrol 95

3 years

1 477 €

≈ 742 L petrol 95

5 years

2 462 €

≈ 1237 L petrol 95

10 years

4 924 €

≈ 2474 L petrol 95

Cumulative savings for Xpeng X9 versus BMW 220d Active Tourer F44. Excluding purchase, insurance, maintenance and depreciation.

Annual cost breakdown by charging mix

Projection over 15 000 km/year, by proportion of each charging type.

Xpeng

X9

Charging mixkm/year€/kmAnnual cost
100% Homeoff-peak rate · 0,21 €/kWh15 000 km3 300 kWh0,048 €/km721 €
100% AC stationpublic AC rate · 0,30 €/kWh15 000 km3 300 kWh0,069 €/km1 030 €
100% Fast DCDC motorway rate · 0,45 €/kWh15 000 km3 300 kWh0,103 €/km1 544 €
Typical mix80% home · 15% AC · 5% DC15 000 km3 300 kWh0,054 €/km808 €
Annual total (typical mix)808 €
BMW

220d Active Tourer F44

Fuelkm/year€/kmAnnual cost
Annual fuel1,75 €/L15 000 km0,076 €/km1 144 €

Other similar comparisons

BmwVSXpeng

216d Gran Tourer vs X9

BmwVSXpeng

216d Gran Tourer vs X9

BmwVSXpeng

216d Gran Tourer vs X9

Frequently asked questions

On a 100 km mixed trip, the Xpeng X9 is about 40% cheaper than the BMW 220d Active Tourer with default parameters. This ratio shifts with your actual energy prices — simulate for your profile.

The declared range of the Xpeng X9 is 460 km (WLTP/EPA). In real-world conditions, expect 10-20% less.

The Xpeng X9 is cheaper across all distances with default rates. If your energy prices differ significantly, simulate to see the real impact on your budget.