Over 0–100 km/h, M3 Competition F80 wins (3,88 s vs 5,25 s).
Performance comparison
Simulated drag race 0 → 1,000 m in real time. Synchronised speed counters and stopwatch. Physics calibration on 7 manufacturer measurements.
Simulation
Calibration
Physics model calibrated on manufacturer splits. The limited top speed is not the real aerodynamic top speed of the vehicles.
| M3 Competition F80 | Giulia Veloce | |
|---|---|---|
| 0–100 km/h | 3,88 s−1,38 s | 5,25 s |
| 400 m standing start | 11,65 s−1,91 s | 13,56 s |
| 1,000 m standing start | 20,92 s−3,97 s | 24,89 s |
| Top speed (electronically limited) | 250 km/h+10 km/h | 240 km/h |
| Power-to-weight ratio | 3,39 kg/hpbetter ratio | 5,68 kg/hp |
Standing-start drag race, calibrated on manufacturer splits. The gap shows at each stage.
Simulated performance at each stage. Winner in green.
| Palier | M3 Competition F80 | Giulia Veloce |
|---|---|---|
| 0–30 km/h | 1,14 s | 1,41 s |
| 0–50 km/h | 1,90 s | 2,11 s |
| 0–80 km/h | 3,01 s | 3,73 s |
| 0–100 km/h | 3,88 s | 5,25 s |
| 0–120 km/h | 4,84 s | 7,04 s |
| 0–160 km/h | 7,51 s | 12,32 s |
| 0–200 km/h | 11,33 s | 21,59 s |
| 400 m standing start | 11,65 s | 13,56 s |
| 1,000 m standing start | 20,92 s | 24,89 s |
| Top speed limited | 250 km/h | 240 km/h |
Manufacturer technical specifications. The power-to-weight ratio is the key physical factor in a drag race.
| Characteristic | Value | Detail |
|---|---|---|
| Power | 510 hp | Pending |
| Torque | 650 Nm | |
| Weight | 1 730 kg | manufacturer kerb weight |
| Drivetrain | - | |
| Gearbox | Eight-speed M Steptronic transmission with Drivelogic |
| Characteristic | Value | Detail |
|---|---|---|
| Power | 280 hp | Pending |
| Torque | 400 Nm | |
| Weight | 1 590 kg | manufacturer kerb weight |
| Drivetrain | - | |
| Gearbox | 8-speed automatic |
Off the line, the Bmw M3 Competition hits 100 km/h in 3.88 s versus 5.26 s for the Giulia Veloce. At this point, the Bmw M3 Competition leads by 1.38 s and sits roughly 9 m ahead.
At 200 metres, the Bmw M3 Competition is doing 163 km/h against 135 km/h for the Giulia Veloce. The gap is 1.09 s. The challenger starts to claw back ground.
At 400 metres standing start, the Bmw M3 Competition crosses the line in 11.64 s versus 13.56 s. The 1.91 s gap represents roughly 86 m of track - a gap visible to the naked eye.
Past 400 metres, the Bmw M3 Competition continues to build its lead. At 600 metres, it runs at 228 km/h versus 186 km/h. At 1,000 metres, the Bmw M3 Competition finishes in 20.91 s versus 24.89 s, with a 3.98 s lead. Both vehicles have similar top speeds (250 (i.e. 155 mph - industry threshold) vs 240 km/h), preventing any comeback.
Both rivals are electronically governed, but not at the same level: the Bmw M3 Competition is capped at 250 (i.e. 155 mph - industry threshold) km/h, the Giulia Veloce at 240 km/h. This isn’t a physical engine limit - it’s a manufacturer choice, usually for tyre safety or homologation reasons. Neither car reaches its true aerodynamic top speed.
With two combustion powertrains, the difference comes down to power-to-weight ratio (3.39 kg/hp vs 5.68 kg/hp) and transmission (Automatic vs Automatic).
In European road use (130 km/h max), both vehicles reach the legal speed limit in under 8.11 seconds. The 1.38 s difference in 0 to 100 km/h is mostly felt in motorway merging and overtaking.
Over 0–100 km/h, M3 Competition F80 wins (3,88 s vs 5,25 s).
M3 Competition F80 goes from 0 to 100 km/h in 3,88 seconds (calibrated simulation).
M3 Competition F80: 510 hp, ratio 3,39 kg/hp. Giulia Veloce: 280 hp, ratio 5,68 kg/hp.
M3 Competition F80: 250 km/h. Giulia Veloce: 240 km/h.