Tesla Model 3 Long Range AWD vs Alfa Romeo Giulia Veloce: which is truly faster?

Off the line, the Model 3 Long Range AWD hits 100 km/h in 4.33 s versus 5.26 s for the Giulia Veloce. The instant torque of 611 Nm from the electric motor makes the difference. At this point, the Model 3 Long Range AWD leads by 0.93 s and sits roughly 8 m ahead.

At 200 metres, the Model 3 Long Range AWD is doing 145 km/h against 135 km/h for the Giulia Veloce. The gap is 0.61 s. The challenger starts to claw back ground.

At 400 metres standing start, the Model 3 Long Range AWD crosses the line in 12.66 s versus 13.56 s. The 0.90 s gap represents roughly 41 m of track — a gap visible to the naked eye.

Past 400 metres, the Model 3 Long Range AWD continues to build its lead. At 600 metres, it runs at 199 km/h versus 186 km/h. At 1,000 metres, the Model 3 Long Range AWD finishes in 23.21 s versus 24.89 s, with a 1.68 s lead. Both vehicles have similar top speeds (233 vs 240 km/h), preventing any comeback.

Both rivals are electronically governed, but not at the same level: the Model 3 Long Range AWD is capped at 233 km/h, the Giulia Veloce at 240 km/h. This isn’t a physical engine limit — it’s a manufacturer choice, usually for tyre safety or homologation reasons. Neither car reaches its true aerodynamic top speed.

Instant electric torque gives an advantage off the line. The higher top speed of the combustion engine gives an advantage over longer distances. The distance at which one catches the other depends on the top speed differential.

In European road use (130 km/h max), both vehicles reach the legal speed limit in under 8.11 seconds. The 0.93 s difference in 0 to 100 km/h is mostly felt in motorway merging and overtaking.