Sur 0–100 km/h, Giulia Veloce gagne (5,25 s vs 8,23 s).
Performance comparison
Simulated drag race 0 → 1,000 m in real time. Synchronised speed counters and stopwatch. Physics calibration on 7 manufacturer measurements.
Simulation
Calibration
Physics model calibrated on manufacturer splits. The limited top speed is not the real aerodynamic top speed of the vehicles.
| Giulia Veloce | XC40 B4 | |
|---|---|---|
| 0–100 km/h | 5,25 s−2,98 s | 8,23 s |
| 400 m standing start | 13,56 s−2,55 s | 16,11 s |
| 1,000 m standing start | 24,89 s−4,50 s | 29,39 s |
| Top speed (electronically limited) | 240 km/h+60 km/h | 180 km/h |
| Power-to-weight ratio | 5,68 kg/hpbetter ratio | 8,17 kg/hp |
Standing-start drag race, calibrated on manufacturer splits. The gap shows at each stage.
Simulated performance at each stage. Winner in green.
| Palier | Giulia Veloce | XC40 B4 |
|---|---|---|
| 0–30 km/h | 1,41 s | 1,98 s |
| 0–50 km/h | 2,11 s | 3,12 s |
| 0–80 km/h | 3,73 s | 5,74 s |
| 0–100 km/h | 5,25 s | 8,23 s |
| 0–120 km/h | 7,04 s | 11,35 s |
| 0–160 km/h | 12,32 s | 21,46 s |
| 0–200 km/h | 21,59 s | — |
| 400 m standing start | 13,56 s | 16,11 s |
| 1,000 m standing start | 24,89 s | 29,39 s |
| Top speed | 240 km/h | 180 km/h |
Manufacturer technical specifications. The power-to-weight ratio is the key physical factor in a drag race.
| Characteristic | Value | Detail |
|---|---|---|
| Power | 280 hp | Pending |
| Torque | 400 Nm | |
| Weight | 1 590 kg | manufacturer kerb weight |
| Drivetrain | Giulia Veloce 2024 | |
| Gearbox | 8-speed automatic |
| Characteristic | Value | Detail |
|---|---|---|
| Power | 197 hp | 2 |
| Torque | 300 Nm | |
| Weight | 1 610 kg | manufacturer kerb weight |
| Drivetrain | Traction | |
| Gearbox | — |
Off the line, the Giulia Veloce hits 100 km/h in 5.26 s versus 8.23 s for the XC40 B4. At this point, the Giulia Veloce leads by 2.98 s and sits roughly 23 m ahead.
At 200 metres, the Giulia Veloce is doing 135 km/h against 115 km/h for the XC40 B4. The gap is 1.71 s. The challenger starts to claw back ground.
At 400 metres standing start, the Giulia Veloce crosses the line in 13.56 s versus 16.10 s. The 2.54 s gap represents roughly 96 m of track — a gap visible to the naked eye.
Past 400 metres, the Giulia Veloce continues to build its lead. At 600 metres, it runs at 186 km/h versus 158 km/h. At 1,000 metres, the Giulia Veloce finishes in 24.89 s versus 29.39 s, with a 4.50 s lead.
Both rivals are electronically governed, but not at the same level: the Giulia Veloce is capped at 240 km/h, the XC40 B4 at 180 km/h. This isn’t a physical engine limit — it’s a manufacturer choice, usually for tyre safety or homologation reasons. Neither car reaches its true aerodynamic top speed.
With two combustion powertrains, the difference comes down to power-to-weight ratio (5.68 kg/hp vs 8.17 kg/hp) and transmission (Automatic vs auto).
In European road use (130 km/h max), both vehicles reach the legal speed limit in under 13.40 seconds. The 2.98 s difference in 0 to 100 km/h is mostly felt in motorway merging and overtaking.
Swap one of the two models to explore an equivalent duel in the same segment.
Sur 0–100 km/h, Giulia Veloce gagne (5,25 s vs 8,23 s).
Giulia Veloce passe de 0 à 100 km/h en 5,25 secondes (simulation calibrée).
Giulia Veloce : 280 hp, ratio 5,68 kg/hp. XC40 B4 : 197 hp, ratio 8,17 kg/hp.
Giulia Veloce : 240 km/h. XC40 B4 : 180 km/h.