Sur 0–100 km/h, Giulia Veloce gagne (5,25 s vs 8,36 s).
Performance comparison
Simulated drag race 0 → 1,000 m in real time. Synchronised speed counters and stopwatch. Physics calibration on 7 manufacturer measurements.
Simulation
Calibration
Physics model calibrated on manufacturer splits. The limited top speed is not the real aerodynamic top speed of the vehicles.
| Giulia Veloce | DS9 E-Tense 250 | |
|---|---|---|
| 0–100 km/h | 5,25 s−3,10 s | 8,36 s |
| 400 m standing start | 13,56 s−2,66 s | 16,22 s |
| 1,000 m standing start | 24,89 s−3,68 s | 28,57 s |
| Top speed (electronically limited) | 240 km/h+5 km/h | 235 km/h |
| Power-to-weight ratio | 5,68 kg/hpbetter ratio | 7,51 kg/hp |
Standing-start drag race, calibrated on manufacturer splits. The gap shows at each stage.
Simulated performance at each stage. Winner in green.
| Palier | Giulia Veloce | DS9 E-Tense 250 |
|---|---|---|
| 0–30 km/h | 1,41 s | 2,40 s |
| 0–50 km/h | 2,11 s | 4,01 s |
| 0–80 km/h | 3,73 s | 6,47 s |
| 0–100 km/h | 5,25 s | 8,36 s |
| 0–120 km/h | 7,04 s | 10,88 s |
| 0–160 km/h | 12,32 s | 18,12 s |
| 0–200 km/h | 21,59 s | 31,70 s |
| 400 m standing start | 13,56 s | 16,22 s |
| 1,000 m standing start | 24,89 s | 28,57 s |
| Top speed | 240 km/h | 235 km/h |
Manufacturer technical specifications. The power-to-weight ratio is the key physical factor in a drag race.
| Characteristic | Value | Detail |
|---|---|---|
| Power | 280 hp | Pending |
| Torque | 400 Nm | |
| Weight | 1 590 kg | manufacturer kerb weight |
| Drivetrain | Giulia Veloce 2024 | |
| Gearbox | 8-speed automatic |
| Characteristic | Value | Detail |
|---|---|---|
| Power | 253 hp | Pending |
| Torque | 520 Nm | |
| Weight | 1 900 kg | manufacturer kerb weight |
| Drivetrain | DS9 E-Tense 250 | |
| Gearbox | 8-speed automatic |
Off the line, the Giulia Veloce hits 100 km/h in 5.26 s versus 8.36 s for the DS9 E-Tense 250. Despite lacking instant torque, 280 hp of power compensates. At this point, the Giulia Veloce leads by 3.10 s and sits roughly 34 m ahead.
At 200 metres, the Giulia Veloce is doing 135 km/h against 121 km/h for the DS9 E-Tense 250. The gap is 2.14 s. The challenger starts to claw back ground.
At 400 metres standing start, the Giulia Veloce crosses the line in 13.56 s versus 16.22 s. The 2.66 s gap represents roughly 107 m of track — a gap visible to the naked eye.
Past 400 metres, the Giulia Veloce continues to build its lead. At 600 metres, it runs at 186 km/h versus 170 km/h. At 1,000 metres, the Giulia Veloce finishes in 24.89 s versus 28.57 s, with a 3.68 s lead. Both vehicles have similar top speeds (240 vs 235 km/h), preventing any comeback.
Electronically capped at 240 km/h, the Giulia Veloce never reaches its natural aerodynamic ceiling in this duel. That’s not a physical limit of the motor — it’s a deliberate manufacturer decision, typically tied to standard-fit tyre ratings or model-range positioning.
Instant electric torque gives an advantage off the line. The higher top speed of the combustion engine gives an advantage over longer distances. The distance at which one catches the other depends on the top speed differential.
In European road use (130 km/h max), both vehicles reach the legal speed limit in under 12.32 seconds. The 3.10 s difference in 0 to 100 km/h is mostly felt in motorway merging and overtaking.
Swap one of the two models to explore an equivalent duel in the same segment.
Sur 0–100 km/h, Giulia Veloce gagne (5,25 s vs 8,36 s).
Giulia Veloce passe de 0 à 100 km/h en 5,25 secondes (simulation calibrée).
Giulia Veloce : 280 hp, ratio 5,68 kg/hp. DS9 E-Tense 250 : 253 hp, ratio 7,51 kg/hp.
Giulia Veloce : 240 km/h. DS9 E-Tense 250 : 235 km/h.