Sur 0–100 km/h, Stelvio Veloce gagne (5,76 s vs 6,89 s).
Performance comparison
Simulated drag race 0 → 1,000 m in real time. Synchronised speed counters and stopwatch. Physics calibration on 7 manufacturer measurements.
Simulation
Calibration
Physics model calibrated on manufacturer splits. The limited top speed is not the real aerodynamic top speed of the vehicles.
| Stelvio Veloce | Q7 SUV | |
|---|---|---|
| 0–100 km/h | 5,76 s−1,13 s | 6,89 s |
| 400 m standing start | 14,12 s−0,88 s | 15,00 s |
| 1,000 m standing start | 26,01 s−1,71 s | 27,72 s |
| Top speed (electronically limited) | 230 km/h+4 km/h | 226 km/h |
| Power-to-weight ratio | 6,59 kg/hpbetter ratio | 9,44 kg/hp |
Standing-start drag race, calibrated on manufacturer splits. The gap shows at each stage.
Simulated performance at each stage. Winner in green.
| Palier | Stelvio Veloce | Q7 SUV |
|---|---|---|
| 0–30 km/h | 1,32 s | 1,30 stight gap |
| 0–50 km/h | 2,24 s | 2,31 stight gap |
| 0–80 km/h | 4,12 s | 4,66 s |
| 0–100 km/h | 5,76 s | 6,89 s |
| 0–120 km/h | 7,99 s | 9,75 s |
| 0–160 km/h | 14,32 s | 18,12 s |
| 0–200 km/h | 26,33 s | 33,89 s |
| 400 m standing start | 14,12 s | 15,00 s |
| 1,000 m standing start | 26,01 s | 27,72 s |
| Top speed | 230 km/h | 226 km/h |
Manufacturer technical specifications. The power-to-weight ratio is the key physical factor in a drag race.
| Characteristic | Value | Detail |
|---|---|---|
| Power | 280 hp | Pending |
| Torque | 400 Nm | |
| Weight | 1 845 kg | manufacturer kerb weight |
| Drivetrain | Stelvio Veloce 2024 | |
| Gearbox | 8-speed automatic |
| Characteristic | Value | Detail |
|---|---|---|
| Power | 231 hp | Pending |
| Torque | 500 Nm | |
| Weight | 2 180 kg | manufacturer kerb weight |
| Drivetrain | Integrale (AWD) | |
| Gearbox | 8-speed tiptronic |
Off the line, the Stelvio Veloce hits 100 km/h in 5.76 s versus 6.89 s for the Q7 SUV. At this point, the Stelvio Veloce leads by 1.13 s and sits roughly 6 m ahead.
At 200 metres, the Stelvio Veloce is doing 129 km/h against 119 km/h for the Q7 SUV. The gap is 0.49 s. The challenger starts to claw back ground.
At 400 metres standing start, the Stelvio Veloce crosses the line in 14.12 s versus 15.00 s. The 0.88 s gap represents roughly 36 m of track — a gap visible to the naked eye.
Past 400 metres, the Stelvio Veloce continues to build its lead. At 600 metres, it runs at 177 km/h versus 165 km/h. At 1,000 metres, the Stelvio Veloce finishes in 26.01 s versus 27.71 s, with a 1.70 s lead. Both vehicles have similar top speeds (230 vs 226 km/h), preventing any comeback.
Both rivals are electronically governed, but not at the same level: the Stelvio Veloce is capped at 230 km/h, the Q7 SUV at 226 km/h. This isn’t a physical engine limit — it’s a manufacturer choice, usually for tyre safety or homologation reasons. Neither car reaches its true aerodynamic top speed.
With two combustion powertrains, the difference comes down to power-to-weight ratio (6.59 kg/hp vs 9.44 kg/hp) and transmission (Automatic vs Automatic).
In European road use (130 km/h max), both vehicles reach the legal speed limit in under 11.45 seconds. The 1.13 s difference in 0 to 100 km/h is mostly felt in motorway merging and overtaking.
Swap one of the two models to explore an equivalent duel in the same segment.
Sur 0–100 km/h, Stelvio Veloce gagne (5,76 s vs 6,89 s).
Stelvio Veloce passe de 0 à 100 km/h en 5,76 secondes (simulation calibrée).
Stelvio Veloce : 280 hp, ratio 6,59 kg/hp. Q7 SUV : 231 hp, ratio 9,44 kg/hp.
Stelvio Veloce : 230 km/h. Q7 SUV : 226 km/h.